Julia Steiny: Advanced Math & Science Charter School, Part II1
Julia Steiny follows up her first piece on the AMSA Charter School with an examination of how the... Read More
Experts at the TED conference on math instruction emphasize the use of the calculator as a way to access more complex problem solving questions.
As calculators have enabled a shift away from number crunching to problem solving, graphing calculators have become standard in the classroom and in state assessment. And the use of the devices have become topic of discussion at a recent TED Conference on math instruction.
Use of graphing calculators was first allowed on the SAT and Advanced Placement Calculus exams in 1994. They are now able to be used on sections of the ACT, AP Chemistry and AP Statistics, and are required on many state assessments, writes Anna M. Phillips at the New York Times.
Christine Betaneli, a spokeswoman at the Educational Testing Service, said:
“We’ve included the calculator to reduce the emphasis on computation and to focus more attention on reasoning skills.”
However, Michael Holmes, who teaches AP Chemistry at the High School of American Studies at Lehman College in the Bronx, noticed a lack of complexity in the multiple-choice portion of the chemistry exam — on which calculators are not allowed.
“Where calculators are permitted, in the free-response section, he finds less emphasis on memorization than when he took the exam nearly two decades ago.”
Also, Holmes remarked that he believes calculators can trip up even the high-achieving students who put too much faith in whatever answer comes back at them.
Cara Lin Bridgman, an American teaching in Taiwan, used the term “calculator management” when describing the math class she took at the University of Tennessee.
“We learned how to control the calculator to make it solve the problems, but it doesn’t mean I know how to solve the problems or what the calculator is doing.”
J. Michael Shaughnessy, president of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, believes it is up to curriculum designers and teachers to make their use of the devices “selective and strategic,” as the organization’s position paper on calculators states, writes Phillips.
“You will hear some teachers saying, ‘Oh, I can’t use it that much.’ Those instances are going to become less over time. There’s just too much momentum, and eventually those of us who are that age will retire.”
Wednesday
January 25th, 2012
Filed Under
Julia Steiny follows up her first piece on the AMSA Charter School with an examination of how the... Read More
As an increasing number of students choose to take the GED rather than pursue a high school... Read More
A nutrition lobbyist says that current legislation are giving parents confusing messages about... Read More
The way we used to teach math mirrors our effective interventions for those students struggling as... Read More
C.M. Rubin interviews the leaders of the major publishers, retailers and e-tailers, as well as the... Read More
C. M. Rubin interviews Dr. Madhav Chavan, CEO of the largest NGO in India, about poverty and... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
I’m not sure I understand the issue here. The article seems to be saying that the use of the calculators is good because it allows the test creators to examine the takers’ knowledge of the concepts rather than regurgitating fourth-grade math. But just below that it seems to be saying that all students absorb, when using calculators, is how to use calculators. So are calculators a good tool or a bad crutch?
Seems like the article is saying that it is in the hands of curriculum designers and test creators whether the calculators are aids or hindrances to learning. Basically, using a calculator can either allow students to explore more abstract concepts in both math and sciences, and how to apply them, without worrying about simple mathematics, but that potential can only be exploited when the curriculum is sufficiently complex.
[...] TED Conference: Teach Math, Not Calculating [...]