As Ed Tech Blooms, Do We Need More Research on its Use?

Interactive whiteboards are the new overhead projectors, which in their turn were the new chalkboards. Classrooms need ways of putting material up where all of the students can see it, and teachers need ways to create and change the material. But how can we tell if new technology is really improving teaching? That’s one of [...]

Interactive whiteboards are the new overhead projectors, which in their turn were the new chalkboards. Classrooms need ways of putting material up where all of the students can see it, and teachers need ways to create and change the material. But how can we tell if new technology is really improving teaching?

That’s one of the questions being asked at the Florida Education Technology Conference this week in Orlando. The answer, some participants say, is to create a way to get teacher feedback on the technologies.

NPR’s State Impact reports that two conference participants have created a website, EduStar, that will create a database of information much like consumer reports. The difference is that teachers will be the only ones giving ratings and reports, and they will tell what other teachers want to know. One of EduStar’s creators, Aaron Chatterji, explains:

“My mother’s a teacher,” Chatterji said. “She has a smart board in her classroom and a lot of teachers have those across the country. To my knowledge, we don’t have great data to know whether smart boards actually make a difference. As we invest all this money on new technology and new hardware, we ought to know if we’re spending our money on the right things.”

Non-profit research facility WestEd has the same concerns about untested whiz-bang gadgets. Senior Program Director Steve Schneider says that use of higher and higher technology in the classroom is inevitable as the new generation becomes our teachers:

As more teachers who grew up using cell phones, iPads and other devices move into the classroom, Schneider said, they’re more likely to incorporate those devices into their lessons.

But what works, as opposed to what’s available? Schneider agrees that teachers need to know this before committing school or personal resources to the classroom.

Right now I think the research is lagging behind at some level,” Schneider said. “I think overall they leave it to the practitioners to say ‘Is this working for my students?’”

One reason that there’s an explosion of products for classroom teachers is that many schools are shifting to the new Common Core-based curriculum. 45 states and even some of the US territories have adopted Common Core standards. By standardizing what’s expected of students, which is the central mission of the Common Core project, states find it easier to buy curricula and enrichment materials from outside of their own boundaries than when they were tied only to their own legally defined standards.

The change in the education market makes it easier for new technology to break into what has been a very closed market.

In the past, it was difficult for smaller businesses to compete with the large curriculum companies, Chatterji said. It was too expensive for small companies to hire a sales staff to sell to thousands of school districts across the country.

Many innovative marketing ideas are opening up the technology market. Of particular interest to participants at the FETC conference, Florida is backing its digital textbooks initiative with allowing its teachers to reach outside old boundaries:

Florida has gotten in on the trend as well, creating the Florida Virtual Curriculum Marketplace to sell digital content. Other sites allow teachers to sell lesson plans to each other.

There’s clearly a need for websites such as EduStar to begin helping teachers sort out what’s helpful for their students and what’s just glitter. Even when education is about bytes and bits, it’s still really about the kids.

Comments


  1. Ted Kraver

    This question was first raised in 1988 in a OTA report where they found that that education, our last emerging technology industry of education only had $100 M (mostly military) vs the $10′s of billions for technology industries of comparable size.
    The situation has not improved in 25 years.
    So my first reaction was “Duh!” to your question that heads this article.
    I suggest that a massive advocacy effort by our digital education industry focused on the tech R&D committees in Congress is the only way to crank up federal R&D to a level of $7 billion that is needed for 21st century education.


  2. Rob Foshay

    In a new report from the US ED Office of EducationalTechnology, a team of researchers led by Barbara Means of SRI International proposes a staged model evidence for new technologies, beginning with the kind of small studies using data easily gathered by cloud-based products and used for continuous improvement of effectiveness. The draft is at http://www.ed.gov/edblogs/technology/evidence-framework/

    There are two other points to make:
    1) The effects of education technologies are defined by their uses, not by their presence in the classroom. Therefore, the precision of effectiveness research of any kind is limited by how well a consistent use model (use case) is defined and how consistently it is implemented. Asking a general question about effectiveness of a technology is the wrong question.
    2) Many uses of technology in schools are not intended to improve learning; they are instead designed to improve efficiency or save cost. For these technologies, the appropriate effectiveness questions are first on cost-efficiency, and possibly later on cost-effectiveness — which may or may not include effects on learning.

    We certainly need more funding for research on technology, but let’s make sure our stakeholders are asking the right questions of the research.


    • Leslie Wilson

      Rob – totally, all-in, agree with your points!! The ‘power’ and meaningful use of technologies has everything to do with professional learning that accompanies acquisition!! no piece of equipment makes a difference if not successful engaged/utilized for student collaboration/learning matters-with results. Project RED is another research endeavor that demonstrated this important and neglected point. nationally, there are many ed tech purchases that had no powerful results b/c the implementation was not well imagined, designed, planned and incorporated effective professional developments.

Leave a comment

Thursday

January 31st, 2013

Recent News

Career Index

Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.

View All