Books in the home as important as parents’ education level in determining level of education children will attain

RENO, Nev. – Whether rich or poor, residents of the United States or China, illiterate or college graduates, parents who have books in the home increase the level of education their children will attain, according to a 20-year study lead by Mariah Evans, University of Nevada, Reno associate professor of sociology and resource economics

Books in the home as important as parents’ education level in determining level of education children will attain

University of Nevada, Reno sociologist leads 20-year study of over 70,000 cases in 27 countries

 

RENO, Nev. – Whether rich or poor, residents of the United States or China, illiterate or college graduates, parents who have books in the home increase the level of education their children will attain, according to a 20-year study lead by Mariah Evans, University of Nevada, Reno associate professor of sociology and resource economics.

 

For years, educators have thought the strongest predictor of attaining high levels of education was having parents who were highly educated. But, strikingly, this massive study showed that the difference between being raised in a bookless home compared to being raised in a home with a 500-book library has as great an effect on the level of education a child will attain as having parents who are barely literate (3 years of education) compared to having parents who have a university education (15 or 16 years of education). Both factors, having a 500-book library or having university-educated parents, propel a child 3.2 years further in education, on average.

 

Being a sociologist, Evans was particularly interested to find that children of lesser-educated parents benefit the most from having books in the home. She has been looking for ways to help Nevada’s rural communities, in terms of economic development and education.

 

“What kinds of investments should we be making to help these kids get ahead?” she asked. “The results of this study indicate that getting some books into their homes is an inexpensive way that we can help these children succeed.”   

 

Evans said, “Even a little bit goes a long way,” in terms of the number of books in a home. Having as few as 20 books in the home still has a significant impact on propelling a child to a higher level of education, and the more books you add, the greater the benefit.

 

“You get a lot of ‘bang for your book’,” she said. “It’s quite a good return-on-investment in a time of scarce resources.”

 

In some countries, such as China, having 500 or more books in the home propels children 6.6 years further in their education. In the United States, the effect is less, 2.4 years, than the 3.2-year average advantage experienced across all 27 countries in the study. But, Evans points out that 2.4 years is still a significant advantage in terms of educational attainment.

 

For example, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, Americans who have some college or an associate’s degree, but not a bachelor’s degree, earn an average of $7,213 more annually than those with just a high school education. Those who attain a bachelor’s degree earn $21,185 more each year, on average, than those with just high school diplomas.

 

The study by Evans and her colleagues at Nevada, UCLA and Australian National University is one of the largest and most comprehensive studies ever conducted on what influences the level of education a child will attain.

 

The researchers were struck by the strong effect having books in the home had on children’s educational attainment even above and beyond such factors as education level of the parents, the country’s GDP, the father’s occupation or the political system of the country.

 

Having books in the home is twice as important as the father’s education level, and more important than whether a child was reared in China or the United States. Surprisingly, the difference in educational attainment for children born in the United States and children born in China was just 2 years, less than two-thirds the effect that having 500 or more books in the home had on children (3.2 years).

 

The study, “Family scholarly culture and educational success: Books and schooling in 27 nations,” was published in the journal, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility (online at www.sciencedirect.com).

 

# # #

 

Nevada’s land-grant university founded in 1874, the University of Nevada, Reno has an enrollment of nearly 17,000 students. The University is home to one the country’s largest study-abroad programs and the state’s medical school, and offers outreach and education programs in all Nevada counties. For more information, visit www.unr.edu.

Comments


  1. Julie Niles Petersen

    I think that having books in the home is so important because it gives parents something to talk about with their children. I think it is the amount of talk in the home that makes the most difference. Unfortunately, there are many parents out there who think it is weird to talk to their children, so they don't. Then these children enter our school systems with impoverished vocabularies making it very difficult for them to ever catch up.

    If you are interested in learning more about the importance of talk in the home, see my blog post that talks about the landmark Hart & Risley study at: http://twrctank.com/2010/04/15/what-happens-in-the-home-before-kids-start-school-affects-their-vocabulary-and-overall-academic-success/

    In addition, if you have not heard about the Reach Out and Read program that gets books into homes, you might want to check out this post: http://twrctank.com/2010/04/21/medicine-to-help-prevent-reading-difficulties-the-reach-out-and-read-program/

    Because of studies like these, I truly believe that if we want to make any kind of dent in the achievement gap, we need to invest more money in the education of children before they even enter school.


  2. Erika

    Having books is important. However, more important is having the parent spend the time reading the books to the child (when they are young and still unable to read at least). What's the value in having a 500 book library if no one will spend the time reading the books to the child?


  3. Rupa

    The irony is that it's the more educated parents who're more likely to have a library at home and read this news article. They're also the ones who're better-informed about the benefits of reading to their kids and who can afford the luxury of time. The key lies in ensuring that the less educated parents read and absorb the essence of this report, have access to age-appropriate books and to resources that help them expose their children to books. Programs like Reach out and Read are crucial in this respect.


  4. Concerned Teacher

    So, which child is more likely to go to a charter school?
    A. The student who has no books in their home.
    B. The student who has some printed material in their home.
    C. The student who has never seen an adult read anything in their home.
    D. The student who has seen an adult enjoy printed material at least occasionally in their home.
    E. The student who has never been to a library.
    F. The student who has visited the library.

    Select all that apply.


  5. Colleen

    In a culture of poverty, entertainment for the whole group is valued over entertainment for one idividual. I have a feeling that educated or not, Chinese parents value books. I know that is not true in all homes and books sent home are not valued.

Leave a comment

Thursday

May 20th, 2010

Jimmy Kilpatrick

Subscribe

Enter your email to subscribe to daily Education News!

Hot Topics

Career Index

Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.

View All