<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study Shows Infants Too Young to Learn Arithmetic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.educationnews.org/parenting/study-shows-infants-too-young-to-learn-arithmetic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.educationnews.org/parenting/study-shows-infants-too-young-to-learn-arithmetic/</link>
	<description>Education News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:27:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.educationnews.org/parenting/study-shows-infants-too-young-to-learn-arithmetic/#comment-10264</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 21:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.educationnews.org/?p=215314#comment-10264</guid>
		<description>I personally think that a number line (which number comes after seven?) should be learned in kindergarten. But simple addition facts (6 + 8 = 14) should be learned in second-grade (age 7-8).  If kids learn to give correct answers to the 30 or so basic addition facts at a minimum rate of 40 per minute, there would be no subsequent problems in math or science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think that a number line (which number comes after seven?) should be learned in kindergarten. But simple addition facts (6 + 8 = 14) should be learned in second-grade (age 7-8).  If kids learn to give correct answers to the 30 or so basic addition facts at a minimum rate of 40 per minute, there would be no subsequent problems in math or science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
