Education Tax Credit Program Ruled Unconstitutional in New Hampshire
The New Hampshire Superior Court ruled this week that the state’s new education tax credit... Read More
Despite Parent Revolution claiming a figure of 70% valid signatures, the Adelanto School District has rejected the takeover petition for the second time.
In a somewhat unsurprising and anticlimactic move, the Adelanto School District board has again rejected the petition trying to invoke a 2010 state law that permit parents to seize control of low-performing schools.
“Our children are much too precious to turn them over to groups that have no track record of proven success,” said Lanita Dominque, a teacher and president of the Adelanto District Teachers Association.
The parents, supported by Parent Revolution, had hoped to use the ‘trigger law’ to convert the failing Desert Trails Elementary School into a charter school. After years of weak academic performance the school, where the pass rate for reading and math tests is less than 50%, they want to use the advantages of charter schools to start turning things around. The parents believe that having the ability to hire non-union teachers and renegotiate the contract with the union will help Desert Trails. They had already had their petition rejected once for allegedly failing to meet the minimum 50% threshold of valid signatures, and the latest meeting was essentially a repeat of that event.
The petition drive has been fraught with acrimony as the two sides accused each other of fraud and forgery in trying to meet the 50-percent threshold or in presenting rescission affidavits from parents who claimed they were misled into initially giving their support.
“I could care less if I don’t get elected to office again, but today I stand for all of Adelanto in saying we will not be duped by anybody,” school board member Jermaine Wright said in explaining her vote against the petition.
Parent Revolution, however, claims that supporters had collected valid signatures from around 70% of parents and have vowed to challenge the board’s unanimous rejection of their petition in court.
As initially predicted, the Adelanto test case for the ‘trigger law’ looks set to join the one involving Compton’s McKinley Elementary School and be decided by the judiciary. The cases will likely determine the future not only for the schools in question, but the ‘trigger law’ concept nationwide as several other states look set to consider similar legislation to California later this year.
Friday
March 30th, 2012
Filed Under
The New Hampshire Superior Court ruled this week that the state’s new education tax credit... Read More
Tutoring programs offering additional out-of-school instruction to students are drawing a growing... Read More
Microsoft is looking to take a bite out of Apple’s controlling share of the education... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
“Power to the People” we want to have power only!
This will get settled in court and the parents can stop complaining about how oppressed they are by the mean big teachers’ unions.
Parent Revolution, the nonprofit organization backing the latest CA parent trigger petition in Adelanto, needs to apply some common sense. They had parents sign two different petitions and submitted the least favored one to the district. They call it strategy to get district to negotiate. State Senator Gloria Romero, the author of the parent trigger law, initially called their two petition strategy a dubious strategic choice. No wonder parents rescinded their signatures. You only need one petition at the ready to threaten a district to negotiate under the parent trigger law – not two. How does having parents sign two different petitions and submit the least favored choice a strategy to convince a district to negotiate? I’m in favor of parent empowerment and that argument sounds dubious to me too.
http://educatormusing.blogspot.com/2012/04/state-senator-gloria-romero-addresses.html
Parent Revolution is an astro-turfing organization backed by the charter companies. It isn’t actually interested in anything other than making money for its sponsors.