Schools Enlist Parents to Improve Students’ Readiness Every Day
Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
New evidence on school nutrition has shown that there is no link between childhood obesity and the sale of sweets and junk food in schools.
As many school districts across the country implement initiatives that ban the sale of junk food and promote the intake of healthy foods, a new study suggests that these strategies may be ineffective and unnecessary.
Nutritionists at Pennsylvania State University tracked the body mass indexes of 19,450 students from fifth through eighth grade and they could find no correlation at all between obesity and attending a school where sweets and salty snacks were available.
The research included analysis on students in schools where junk food was sold and in schools where it was banned, writes Nicholas Bakalar at the New York Times.
Jennifer Van Hook, the lead author and a professor of sociology and demography at Penn State, said:
“Food preferences are established early in life.
“This problem of childhood obesity cannot be placed solely in the hands of schools.”
This comes after the implementation of the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, which aims to improve the quality of meals served to students in the nation’s cafeterias.
However, officials from school districts from across country roundly criticized the proposed guidelines as many states face extensive fiscal difficulties.
“The cost of complying with the regulations could go as high as $6.8 billion, with $4.1 billion of that covering the additional expense of school breakfasts. The federal government will provide only $1.6 billion in additional funding on implementation, so many districts will be forced to raise meal prices to cover the rest.”
Critics also pointed out that the new restrictions on starches and salt content will make it difficult to produce meals that meet the standard and still be delicious enough for students to enjoy.
Sally Spero, San Diego Unified School District’s food planning supervisor said:
“I know this is well-intended. I’m concerned about unintended consequences: That schools would stop serving breakfast because it would be too expensive, or that kids would stop eating lunch because it doesn’t taste good.”
The study, which suggests that these programs may be ineffective, is thought to give greater weight to these concerns.
Wednesday
February 1st, 2012
Filed Under
Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
by John Jensen, PhD The debate over high-stakes testing pits the need for assessing student... Read More
Teachers and parents spoke out at the Denver Public Schools board meeting about the... Read More
Researchers are expecting a surge in the number of students educated at home by their parents over... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
This is so bad, just because the correlation has not been proven doesn’t mean that there is no effect.
Have people forgotten all the steps to the current fad-focus on weight, junk food in schools, etc.? Go back to the long-ago selling soft drink ads on school athletic field fences — promoting corporate products, to help finance the sports mania that now permeates all school districts. Then, how long since vending machines were also permitted. And, leaving school grounds to go to fast-food places. Not to mention changing school “campuses” to central locations so that few, if any students could walk to school. Go back to schools for education, not for social agendas, over-booked non-education/education involvements. Unravel the trail before it’s made more complicated by outside agendas, outside involvements. Don’t add to the already overloaded non-education education focus which dominates not only school time, but school costs.