IES Releases Condition of Education 2013 Report
The Institute of Education Sciences and the National Center for Education Statistics have released... Read More
Schools across the United States have returned to business as usual following December’s holiday break, but the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut is still fresh in the minds of school personnel as they struggle to deal with questions about security and discipline. Some schools are erring on the side of caution in such [...]

Schools across the United States have returned to business as usual following December’s holiday break, but the Sandy Hook Elementary shooting in Newtown, Connecticut is still fresh in the minds of school personnel as they struggle to deal with questions about security and discipline.
Some schools are erring on the side of caution in such a sensitive climate, with stories of students being suspended in ways their families consider unfair gaining nationwide attention.
17-year old Courtni Webb, a student in the San Francisco, California area, wrote a poem privately as a “therapeutic exercise” in which she expressed empathy for Newtown shooter Adam Lanza. The poem included the following:
‘I understand the killings in Connecticut. I know why he pulled the trigger’
‘Why are we oppressed by a dysfunctional community of haters and blamers?’
Ms. Webb’s notebook was found by a teacher who upon reading the poem turned it over to school officials. Ms. Webb was suspended until further notice.
She and her family argue that she has no history of violence, that she did not express any desire to commit an act of violence or threaten another student, and does not deserve the punishment.
The San Francisco Unified School District will decide whether Ms. Webb poses a threat to staff or students.
In Silver Springs, Maryland, a 6-year old boy formed a ‘pistol’ gesture with his thumb and forefinger and said, “Pow!” to another student. The act was interpreted by a teacher to be a threat by the boy to shoot one of his peers.
In Silver Spring, the 6-year-old’s parents received a Dec. 20 letter from Renee Garraway, an assistant principal at Roscoe Nix Elementary School, saying that their son “threatened to shoot a student” and that he had been spoken to earlier about similar behavior.
While most understand the state of heightened sensitivity that an incident like the Newtown shooting can cause, reactions to both incidents suggest that the public — and school staff — want a blend of safety and sensibility with discipline. Commenters on articles have frequently noted that having a student’s permanent record include a suspension relating to threatening violence could have a major impact on that student’s future.
At the National Post, Matt Gurney opines that, “suspending a kid for saying “Pow!” just makes us look stupid.” Gurney points out that if teachers and administrators want to maintain the public’s respect — and want to be seen as “reliable judges” of students — they need to use their authority wisely.
Thursday
January 3rd, 2013
The Institute of Education Sciences and the National Center for Education Statistics have released... Read More
Minneapolis based consulting and research firm Adventium Labs has developed an educational iOS game... Read More
It seemed like less than a decade ago that the popularity of high school exit exams was at its... Read More
More groups are saying that the time and expense dedicated to standardized testing is having... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
After incidents such as what happened in Connecticut, every school goes haywire and loses all common sense. The administrators and teachers are unable to truly tell whether or not the student’s action is indeed a real threat, and just makes reactionary judgements. It makes the schools and teachers look stupid, really. Before a student is suspended for some action a teacher or administrator thinks is “threatening”, he/she should take into consideration the student’s age, whether they had a history of violent or generally disruptive behavior, and if that student really is a danger to themselves or others. Listening to, and watching students is important, as well as talking with the parents.