Julia Steiny: Advanced Math & Science Charter School, Part II1
Julia Steiny follows up her first piece on the AMSA Charter School with an examination of how the... Read More
Howard County (Maryland) will scrap traditional reading classes from their middle school curriculum, saying literacy will be infused with other classes.
Pending a vote, the Howard County, Maryland board of education is set issue a new schedule for their middle schools that will drop traditional reading classes.
The Howard County Board of Education is scheduled to vote on the proposed change this week, writes Sara Toth at the Howard Tribune.
Board Vice Chairman Frank Aquino said:
“This is going to pass at some time or another, whether it’s next week or next year.”
Under the new schedule, all Howard County middle schools would have a 50-minute, seven-period schedule, as opposed to current variations on a 45-minute, eight-period day, writes Toth.
Literacy instruction would be infused into other classes and traditional reading classes are scrapped in the new state curriculum, said Clarissa Evans, executive director of school improvement and curricular program.
“School officials say stand-alone reading class is inconsistent with the new curriculum, which goes into effect for the 2012-13 academic year.”
Students who need explicit reading instruction will still receive it, Evans said. And she affirmed that reading instruction in other classes would not just be “tacked on at the end of the class.”
Under the new plan, middle schools will undergo a massive change in curriculum. “Content-area” teachers, who teach subjects like science, social studies or math, would have lessons several times a week that focus on critical reading and response skills, outlined Evans.
“We’re restructuring to an extent that I think is greater than people understand in all classes to emphasize literacy skills,” she said.
County teachers have criticized the changes. At a public hearing with the board and central office staff members, several scheduling options were presented.
Other possibilities considered were based around freeing involved teachers from administrative duties or meetings during the implementation period. These included the option of having every-other-day planning period for those teachers, who already have one planning period devoted to administrative duties like lunch supervision or collaborative planning meetings, says William Ryan, executive director of school improvement and administration.
Friday
January 27th, 2012
Filed Under
Julia Steiny follows up her first piece on the AMSA Charter School with an examination of how the... Read More
As an increasing number of students choose to take the GED rather than pursue a high school... Read More
A nutrition lobbyist says that current legislation are giving parents confusing messages about... Read More
The way we used to teach math mirrors our effective interventions for those students struggling as... Read More
C.M. Rubin interviews the leaders of the major publishers, retailers and e-tailers, as well as the... Read More
C. M. Rubin interviews Dr. Madhav Chavan, CEO of the largest NGO in India, about poverty and... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
That sounds good to me. Students will still receive literacy instruction as part of their other subjects which will probably improve educational outcomes.
I haven’t seen an idea this good since that math teacher a while back who inserted a little history into his arithmetic. I believe there is an article in ednews somewhere about how well that worked out.
[...] curriculum, said Clarissa Evans, executive director of school improvement and curricular program.(more) Comments (0) Go to main news [...]
This proposal would eliminate so many opportunities for students to read both informational and literary text, contrary to the claims of central office staff. I am grateful that four members of the Board could see the importance of retaining reading classes for middle school students. While reading only in the content areas is important, it will not provide enough instruction in reading. Reading is a complex skill. Students in middle school are not mature readers, regardless of their reading abilities. Reading, like writing, can always be improved. The student member of the Board, Tomi Williams, expressed this so eloquently when he said, in effect, that he couldn’t vote to eliminate middle school reading classes when they were such an important part of his middle school education.
This proposal would eliminate so many opportunities for students to read both informational and literary text, contrary to the claims of central office staff. I am grateful that four members of the Board could see the importance of retaining reading classes for middle school students. While reading in the content areas is important, it will not provide enough instruction in reading. Reading is a complex skill. Students in middle school are not mature readers, regardless of their reading abilities. Reading, like writing, can always be improved. The student member of the Board, Tomi Williams, expressed this so eloquently when he said, in effect, that he couldn’t vote to eliminate middle school reading classes when they were such an important part of his middle school education.