UNCF Ad Campaign Calls for More Investment in African-American Ed
To emphasize the focus of its new campaign, the United Negro College Fund has somewhat altered its... Read More
Pearson, the test maker under fire for several recent gaffes, has had a fourth question thrown out by New York state education officials. This time it was a math question where the test incorrectly asked students to double the length of two sides of a trapezoid and measure the new perimeter when they had meant [...]
Pearson, the test maker under fire for several recent gaffes, has had a fourth question thrown out by New York state education officials. This time it was a math question where the test incorrectly asked students to double the length of two sides of a trapezoid and measure the new perimeter when they had meant to ask students to double the length of three sides. As asked the question assumed knowledge of the Pythagorean theorem — something not typically taught to fifth-graders.
A spokesman for the State Education Department said that the question would not be counted.
John B. King Jr, commissioner of the State Education Department suggested that Pearson is being unfairly attacked by people with their own agenda; that the scorn over the pineapple and the hare parable was more indicative of increased student access to social media than a sudden failure in testing standards.
“In every administration of a test we’ve had, there’s always the occasion of a typo,” he said. “There is the occasional question that we have to adjust.”
In addition, teachers and advocated opposed to linking teacher pay to student test scores are seizing on every typographical error and controversy in a bid to undermine the reforms.
Fred Smith, writing in the Washington Post, discusses the specifics of how standardized tests for this year were designed. Pearson’s predecessor, CTB, used stand alone field testing which is now considered a flawed approach as students have no incentive to do well on the tests and they thus fail the success prerequisite of the sample students being representative of the whole testing population. Instead of this approach, Pearson actually embed the field test questions inside the real exam.
The assumption behind this approach is that students will strive to do well on all items since they don’t know which ones actually count in evaluating them (and their teachers and schools). By design, about one-third of the multiple-choice items do not count. Performance on these items will be studied to decide which should go on 2013’s exams.
Pearson has a new five year $32 million agreement with the New York State Education Department to develop English Language Arts and math assessments for grades three to eight. It grew rapidly as a result of securing contracts with states following the No Child Left Behind Act.
To emphasize the focus of its new campaign, the United Negro College Fund has somewhat altered its... Read More
The last 12 months have not been kind to K12, Inc., the nation’s most widely-recognized... Read More
This week the superintendent of the Verona school district in Wisconsin pledged to automatically... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
“Pearson is being unfairly attacked by people with their own agenda; that the scorn over the pineapple and the hare parable was more indicative of increased student access to social media than a sudden failure in testing standards.”
In other words Pearson is upset because now their testing methods are being exposed. Perhaps there should have been transparency from the beginning.
Yes, it sucks when the people overseeing your shoddy work become a little more informed! That is so unfair how you can’t pull wool around their eyes anymore.
[...] knowledge of the Pythagorean theorem — something not typically taught to fifth-graders.”(more) Comments (0) Return to main news [...]
[...] also addressed the controversy over this year’s nonsensical test questions, which drew scorn and opprobrium from anti-testing advocates, parents and the news [...]
[...] services to schools around the country, and has lately been subject to questions regarding the quality of its product and its business practices. Advocates of testing respond that a nation that invests $525 billion a [...]