Christopher Mahon: To Help Teachers, Adults Need to Influence Kids
by Christopher Mahon The discussion in America about the problems in education needs to shift a... Read More
Chicago Teachers Union wants a 30% pay increase, stating that internal polls suggest they have the legally required support to go ahead with strike action.
Chicago Teachers Union has said that they have enough internal support for strike action to commence of their talks with Chicago Public Schools break down. A new state law, aimed at making sure industrial action decisions by union leaderships were actually backed by a significant majority of their membership, now requires approval from 75% of a union’s members before striking is lawful. The law was signed by Governor Pat Quinn last year.
CTU spokeswoman Stephanie Gadlin said members at several schools were polled.
“The preliminary results indicate that if a strike vote were held today, teachers in those schools would vote unanimously for a walkout,” Gadlin said.
The announcement is a little surprising as the talks are still in early stages and far from approaching common ground. The main point of contention appears to be teacher salaries. CPS is offering a 2% raise next year, moving eventually to a system of merit pay that would reward teachers for taking the least desirable jobs. Many will take the CTU statement as being merely a heavy-handed negotiating tactic, but Chicago Public Schools are unlikely to be impressed by the preemptive strike threat:
CPS spokeswoman Becky Carroll said it’s still too early in negotiations to talk about a strike.
“Any talk of holding a strike or mock strike votes at this early stage of contract negotiations is a disservice to our children, parents and families and only diverts our energies away from focusing on our students and boosting their achievement in the classroom,” Carroll said.
CTU and CPS have been embroiled in a number of public spats recently over subjects as diverse as discrimination, tenure and charter schools, and have been periodically threatening strike action for some months. With this acrimonious relationship it may be difficult to close the gap between 2% offered and 30% demanded in a mutually satisfactory and affordable way.
If mediation fails then either side can request a panel review the final offers, a process that will take more than two and a half months to complete.
Friday
April 6th, 2012
by Christopher Mahon The discussion in America about the problems in education needs to shift a... Read More
Some of the titans of the technology industry including Microsoft and Google are calling on schools... Read More
The decision to close 49 elementary schools in Chicago has now led to layoff notices being sent out... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
Yes, I’m sure walking off the job will solve everything.
Well I feel that a plan with a purpose always brings about the appropriate results. Children don’t need more of the same.
Considering how rarely teachers unions actually strike, why is no one wondering if the conditions are becoming so bad that they are being forced into an industrial action in order to make things right?
The reason they rarely strike is because the school districts cave to the threat of a strike. Since this strike is actually a strike against the citizens of the district most of the time the district can absorb the 7-10% the Unions threaten to strike over. This is a whopping 30%. Seriously? In today’s economic picture they want 30% more. I say make them prove they are worth that raise and make it merit based on their teaching abilities. Just passing a kid to pad your numbers is not good enough.