School Choice Popularity Growing Steadily in Wisconsin
School choice is a growing movement in Wisconsin as parents increasingly take advantage of... Read More
UK Academies Four Times More Likely to Expel Pupils
Academies in the UK are four times as likely to expel pupils, with accusations that they are abusing their powers to boost results.
As the UK’s equivalent of charter schools and the Government’s darling policy, academies being set up by private organizations have been accused of expelling poorly performing pupils to boost results.
Data from the Department for Education shows children are more likely to be expelled from academies than other state schools. Persistent bad behaviour was named as the main reason for permanent and temporary exclusions, followed by physical assaults on teachers and fellow pupils, writes Graeme Paton at the Telegraph.
While Academy officials insist that these schools are often situated in deprived postcodes with large numbers of problem pupils, the Department of Education has said that, even in similar circumstances, academies are still more likely to exclude difficult children.
Academies are independent state schools given complete freedom from local authorities to control their own admissions and exclusions, and while the Coalition government continues to expand the number of academy schools in the country, critics say the latest figures prove that these organizations are employing their independence to expel the worst pupils.
One such critic, the Anti-Academies Alliance, believes that “by overt and covert means the school population is massaged to remove those pupils who are considered less likely to do well in GCSEs and thus affect the academy’s ratings”.
According the research, academies were 10.2 percent more likely to suspend students every day than state schools.
“Academies also expelled the equivalent of 0.3 per cent of pupils during the academic year – compared with 0.07 per cent nationally.”
A Department of Education spokesman said:
“Academies replacing previously underperforming schools have a very similar exclusion rate as other schools in similar circumstances, but we expect there to be a decrease in exclusions once the academy is properly established and the school begins to improve.”
Recent News
Ohio Study Finds No Correlation Between Teacher Rating, Salary
According to data collected from Ohio’s new value-added teacher ratings, there appears to be... Read More
Dubai to Mandate Parent Rights, Responsibility Contracts
Lawmakers in Dubai hope that forcing schools and parents to sign a legally binding contract before... Read More
Popular News
James Shuls: Why We Need School Choice 26
The Pedagogical Agenda of Common Core Math Standards 24
Julia Steiny: 5th Graders Having a Blast with Algebra 14
Career Index
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
How to run a successful charter:
1. Get government money
2. Push out any underperforming student back to public schools.
3. Claim to get results!
4. Profit
These academies are not really doing themselves any favours. Unless there’s actual data that these kinds of schools are an improvement over the traditional state schools, the program is going to get wound down. And unless they agree to play on a level playing field, there’s never going to be enough data to analyze results.
You don’t understand, Sean. Charters (here and abroad) are not about results. They are about shoehorning free market into public education, for good or ill. (Mostly ill.)
this article underscores the main issues with charter schools, they can expel behavior problems.
If you don’t follow the rules you are out, and then the classroom learning environment is improved, and then everyone learns better.
it was never about taking the highest academic achievers, it is about being able to expel the trouble makers so they no longer bring the other students down.
That is hardly fair to public schools then, since they are obligated to teach everyone.