by Joe Nathan We have things to work on, but Minnesota’s school improvement efforts do not... Read More
The Global Search for Education: More from Canada
Dr. Ben Levin says that a high-pressure system that focuses on testing, teacher evaluation and union bashing won’t give the US the wholesale change it needs.
“The U.S. cannot improve its education system for all or even most children by keeping its present focus on charter schools, more testing, teacher evaluation and union bashing. None of those feature in the best-performing countries. There must be a focus on helping all schools improve, combining pressure with lots of support. That is how to improve system performance.” — Dr. Ben Levin.
Dr. Levin is a Professor and Canada Research Chair in Education Leadership and Policy at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto. He has worked with private research organizations, school districts, provincial governments, and national and international agencies, as well as building an academic and research career. He served as Deputy Minister (chief civil servant) for Education for the Province of Ontario from 2004 to 2007 and again in 2008-09. From 1999 through 2002, he was Deputy Minister of Advanced Education and Deputy Minister of Education, Training and Youth for the Province of Manitoba. He has published five books, most recently, How to Change 5000 Schools. His current interests are in large-scale change, poverty and inequity, and finding better ways to connect research to policy and practice in education.
What kind of educational system will permit a country to have the people skills needed to compete globally?
It’s a very broad question, but essentially the way I would answer it is that you need a system which is both high quality and high equity. That is, large numbers of students who are achieving high levels of skill and confidence, and where the gaps that are based on extraneous factors are small.
What are your views on the standardized testing currently used?
Having good reliable data on student progress and outcomes is essential to making progress. There are lots of indicators other than tests, which are only one measure. For example, graduation rates, participation and success in tertiary education, labor market experiences, proportions of kids referred to special education, and proportion of kids making a year of progress each year are also relevant measures. Where we are going to use testing, we need to make sure that the tests are of a high quality and linked to curriculum; or like PISA, we need to clearly identify important competencies. Test results and other outcome data should not be used punitively; you cannot scare people into excellence.
Do you think the systems we have in place are sufficient to test the broad range of students?
There is no measure that is perfect. Every measure is partial and every measure has error in it, so one needs multiple measures to form a better picture. PISA has tried hard to get at critical thinking, and the tests in Ontario on elementary literacy and numeracy have a very substantial component of critical thinking. Critical thinking isn’t some abstract skill. You have to be thinking critically about something. We also know that most teaching is focused on basic skills, not on higher order skills. We’ve got years and years of evidence showing this.
How do you see the importance of good teachers in the education process?
Good teachers are critical. It is an absolutely vital factor, and the educational systems that are most successful are paying lots of attention to recruiting, retaining, and developing good teachers. They are also providing a system that encourages and fosters good teachers. However, the focus cannot be only on teachers as individuals. Teaching is a social process, so good teachers can only ply their craft in well led and reasonably resourced schools.
How do you see the role of parents in this process?
Parents and families are very important. Family background continues to be the single most powerful predictor of student outcomes. That’s been the case as long as we’ve been measuring and it continues to be the case in every study. We know a lot about how to engage parents more effectively in students’ education but we don’t always use that knowledge.
What can be done to better address the emotional well being of students in an environment where competition is more intense than ever before?
Fortunately, I don’t think that in Canada we are living in that intense world of competition in schools. My perception of this is that in Canada the proportion of kids who are subject to intense pressure is quite small. Frightening kids into working hard would be a mistake. It is far better to engage people in things that they care about, generating real effort that does not come out of fear. There is sometimes too much mindless homework.
Competition to get into our best institutions has significantly increased the pressure on students. Can you share your experiences and comparisons on the Canadian college system?
Canada does not have the same kind of stratified higher education system as in the US. The US higher education system has institutions that are superb and institutions that are not very good at all. Canadian institutions are not all identical in quality, but in this country it doesn’t really matter where you do your undergraduate degree. We don’t have institutions that take everybody they can get and other institutions that only take 1 in 20. I think ours is a better system. You want every institution at least to be good; having some that are great and some that are terrible doesn’t work at all in education. The whole goal is that everybody gets a good education. There is an annual ranking of Canadian universities done by one of our magazines, but we simply don’t have the same kinds of inequalities in higher education.
From a larger perspective, does your country’s definition of educational excellence take into account the quality of life of individuals and of society?
We try to do that. For example, in Ontario for the last five years, we added thousands of teaching positions, almost all of them in areas like art, music, physical education, or languages. So I don’t think there’s an inconsistency between saying we value a broad education and saying we have to ensure our kids can learn to read. We have got to learn to do both things, and I would say Canadian schools do both those things reasonably well by world standards, as judged by our outcome data. (Editor’s note: Canada ranks among the top 10 countries in all categories of the PISA test.)
Any final thoughts on education systems?
There is a conventional wisdom about education, which is that it’s all about economic competitiveness, that I think is wrong. But there is a conventional critique of education which is that’s it’s too much about economic competitiveness and hard skills, that I also think is wrong. We don’t want an educational system that is factory-like in the way it treats young people. That can’t be successful. But equally, the idea that we can have an unstructured, everybody-do-their-own-thing education system, I also find unappealing because the result of that will be that most people will not get a good education. It is possible to balance the concern for real skills with the concern for a broad education, and Canada does that about as well as anyone.
(Photos courtesy of Dwight International School Canada and Dr. Ben Levin)
In The Global Search for Education, join C. M. Rubin and globally renowned thought leaders including Sir Michael Barber (UK), Dr. Leon Botstein (US), Dr. Linda Darling-Hammond (US), Dr. Madhav Chavan (India), Professor Michael Fullan (Canada), Professor Howard Gardner (US), Professor Yvonne Hellman (The Netherlands), Professor Kristin Helstad (Norway), Professor Rose Hipkins (New Zealand), Professor Cornelia Hoogland (Canada), Mme. Chantal Kaufmann (Belgium), Professor Dominique Lafontaine (Belgium), Professor Hugh Lauder (UK), Professor Ben Levin (Canada), Professor Barry McGaw (Australia), Professor R. Natarajan (India), Sridhar Rajagopalan (India), Sir Ken Robinson (UK), Professor Pasi Sahlberg (Finland), Andreas Schleicher (PISA, OECD), Dr. David Shaffer (US), Dr. Kirsten Sivesind (Norway), Chancellor Stephen Spahn (US), Yves Theze (Lycee Francais US), Professor Charles Ungerleider (Canada), Professor Tony Wagner (US), Professor Dylan Wiliam (UK), Professor Theo Wubbels (The Netherlands), Professor Michael Young (UK), and Professor Minxuan Zhang (China) as they explore the big picture education questions that all nations face today.
Follow C. M. Rubin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@cmrubinworld
The mother of Lauren Dunne Astley hopes to turn a personal tragedy into a movement to make sure... Read More
VentureBeat is reporting that Doximity, a company that has long been known for being a “Facebook... Read More
More groups are saying that the time and expense dedicated to standardized testing is having... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
- Select a State Subject
- Animation Schools in Washington State
- Counseling Schools in California
- Gerontology Schools in Pennsylvania
- Select a City Subject
- Animation Schools in Bremerton
- Animation Schools in Everett
- Animation Schools in Kirkland
- Animation Schools in Redmond
- Animation Schools in Seattle
- Counseling Schools in El Cajon
- Counseling Schools in Marysville
- Counseling Schools in Orange
- Counseling Schools in Oroville
- Counseling Schools in Redding
- Counseling Schools in Thousand Oaks
- Counseling Schools in Woodland
- Gerontology Schools in California
- Gerontology Schools in Erie
- Gerontology Schools in Gwynedd Valley
- Gerontology Schools in Harrisburg
- Gerontology Schools in Johnstown
- Gerontology Schools in Philadelphia
- Gerontology Schools in Pittsburgh
- Gerontology Schools in Scranton
- Gerontology Schools in West Chester
- Gerontology Schools in Wilkes Barre
- Gerontology Schools in York