The real reason police failed to stop the student riot

Brian Paddick – Demo-lition 10.11.10. That was the National Union of Students’ logo for the protests in London last Wednesday

Whatever the potentially innocent reason for choosing such a banner, it is clear how some ­students and others intent on trouble would have interpreted it. And that is what they did at Millbank – demolition.

When 2,000 students broke away from the main protest and headed towards Tory Party HQ at 1.30pm, there were no more than half-a-dozen police officers to defend the premises.

Student protests

Demolition: When 2,000 students broke away from the main protest and headed towards Tory Party HQ, there were no more than half-a-dozen police officers to defend the premises

Despite 24,000 students pre-registering with the NUS to go on the march, the night before the protest, police were still denying the demonstration was going to be significant and lined up just 225 officers against an estimated 50,000 students.

So what went wrong and what should have happened? After the Notting Hill Carnival riots in 1976, the Metropolitan Police invested heavily in public order policing, especially in training and equipment. It also trained senior officers to form an elite cadre of public order officers, of which I was proud to be one.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1329550/BRIAN-PADDICK-The-real-reason-police-failed-stop-student-riot.html#ixzz15FuRbtdk

Leave a comment

Sunday

November 14th, 2010

Staff Reporter EducationNews.org

Subscribe

Enter your email to subscribe to daily Education News!

Hot Topics

Career Index

Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.

View All