For high school students facing up to the financial toll a college education can take on a family,... Read More
Colleges Demand Student Athletes Give Up Facebook Privacy
Social media use by students is increasingly monitored by representatives from some universities who are eager to ensure their students behave appropriately.
Student athletes at various universities are finding out that they have no expectation of privacy with regards to their use of social media. A recent revision in the handbook of the University of North Carolina states:
“Each team must identify at least one coach or administrator who is responsible for having access to and regularly monitoring the content of team members’ social networking sites and postings. The athletics department also reserves the right to have other staff members monitor athletes’ posts.”
These students are often required to ‘friend’ either a coach or compliance offer to give the school access to content behind the social media sites own privacy-wall. Once this has been granted the school can monitor all public and semi-public posts by the student on that site, or use a social media monitoring service as provided by UDiligence or Carsity Monitor to automate the task for them. This granting of this access is far from voluntary in most cases, as if the student refuses to give access to their social media, the school can refuse to provide access to sports.
This practice brings up obvious First Amendment concerns. Bradley Shear, a DC lawyer is concerned at the implications for free speech and how far the slippery slope extends downwards.
“I can’t believe some people think it’s OK to do this,” he said. “Maybe it’s OK if you live in a totalitarian regime, but we still have a Constitution to protect us. It’s not a far leap from reading people’s Facebook posts to reading their email. … As a society, where are we going to draw the line?”
Two years ago North Carolina defensive linesman Marvin Austin became the subject of an NCAA investigation into improper conduct after he tweeted about expensive purchases. Incidents like these have led to some schools pursuing aggressive policies with regard to social media.
But avoiding an uncomfortable moment is not a good enough reason to squash free speech, Spear says. Plenty of settled case law in the U.S. sides with students’ rights to express themselves publicly, he said, including numerous cases involving student newspapers. Public displays of protest are also protected: A landmark 1969 Supreme Court decisions known as Tinker vs. the Des Moines School District said school officials couldn’t prevent students from wearing armbands protesting the Vietnam War as long as they weren’t inciting violence.
It also seems likely that the social media themselves will be far from enthused by the school’s policies. Faced with the possibility of extremely negative consequences if they use social media, many students will feel they have little choice but to abandon it entirely.
In a lawsuit filed in federal court, New York City parents and activists are arguing that the high... Read More
A massive online open course about one of the biggest providers of massive online open courses?... Read More
More groups are saying that the time and expense dedicated to standardized testing is having... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
- Select a City Subject
- Law Schools in Anaheim
- Law Schools in Coalinga
- Law Schools in Corona
- Law Schools in Fairfield
- Law Schools in Fullerton
- Law Schools in Hayward
- Law Schools in Huntington Park
- Law Schools in Imperial
- Law Schools in Lancaster
- Law Schools in Malibu
- Law Schools in Milpitas
- Law Schools in Oceanside
- Law Schools in Oxnard
- Law Schools in Redwood City
- Law Schools in Ridgecrest
- Law Schools in San Bruno
- Law Schools in San Marcos
- Law Schools in Santa Ana
- Law Schools in Santa Clara
- Law Schools in Stockton
- Law Schools in Susanville
- Law Schools in Wilmington