The Global Search for Education: A Look at New York Public Schools

C. M. Rubin interviews Eric Nadelstern, former Deputy Chancellor of New York City schools, about the problems facing the New York public school system.

"With our future as a nation at stake, we need to be bold for our schools to be successful with all children." -- Eric Nadelstern

A Bronx native and graduate of DeWitt Clinton High School, Eric Nadelstern worked in New York City public schools for 39 years, rising to the position of Chief Schools Officer, Division of School Support in 2009, and to the position of Deputy Chancellor for the Division of School Support and Instruction for the New York City Department of Education in 2010, from which he retired last year.  He is currently Professor of Practice in Education Leadership at Teachers College, Columbia University, from where he received a Master of Arts degree in 1973. I had the opportunity to chat with Professor Nadelstern about the issues that face the New York City public school system.

What are the problems we face in the New York City public school system?

We are spending $23 billion of the public’s hard earned money in New York City every year to support the country’s largest school district, and yet 35% of the students are not graduating from high school.  The good news is just a few years ago it was half the students, and things had been frozen at that rate for the prior 50 years.  Still, 35% are not graduating and the 35% who aren’t are largely male, African American and Latino.  This is significant evidence that despite everything we are doing, we haven’t been able to close the achievement gap in the city.

What I think differentiates New York from some other countries in the world that I have visited or am familiar with is that we recognize there is an achievement gap.  This contrasts with Israel which runs 5 separate and unequal school systems.  Their primary concern, as in many other places, is to produce the few outstanding mathematicians and scientists who can compete with other countries, compared to thinking about educating the entire population to their highest potential.

In America, it is not that we aren’t producing enough college graduates.  It’s that the students who are most likely to graduate are disproportionately white, Asian, and female in large urban areas versus male, African American, and Latino.  You can still walk into a kindergarten class in New York City on the first day of school, and simply on the basis of race and how kids are dressed, predict with frightening accuracy which kids are likely to graduate 13 years later.  To my mind, that is an intolerable situation and an indication of seated societal issues that we have not begun to address.

Why is the public school system to blame for this?

I’ll give you one example of how we exacerbate the problem, however unintentionally.  For years in New York City we had a seniority transfer plan.  The most senior and consequently most expensive teachers could transfer into middle class schools in areas where they were needed least.  That created a situation in our poorest neighborhoods of the revolving door of the newest teachers.  This went on decade after decade, seemingly with the approval of those in management positions.

"The astonishing thing is why there isn’t a greater sense of outrage from people who work in the system." -- Eric Nadelstern

What should be the goal of the public education system?

I am a product of public education.  My parents were holocaust refugees who came to this country a few years before I was born.  I was the first member of my family to graduate from high school, let alone go to college.  I understand how critical a public education is.  To my mind, that is the American ideal.

So what things would you change and how would you make them better? 

Initially, we were going in the right direction.  We had a mayor who wasn’t beholden to the politicians or other interest groups.  He didn’t seem to have personal ambitions beyond doing the best job he could.  He was prepared to take courageous steps to address the issues.  As time goes on, people invariably become seduced by the system.  Joel Klein used to say I was groomed by the system to run the system but instead I chose to dismantle it, and that is what recommended me to him in the first place.  My need was to change things in order to make them better.

In New York, you would have to tell people living in $4 million dollar coops on the Upper East Side that their kids would have as much chance of going to PS199 as a kid in destitute circumstances in the Bronx; and that the school system was going to make sure that the kid in destitute circumstances had the same chance.  Could you do that for very long?  I don’t know, but that is what you need to do.  When we were in a position to do it, we didn’t have the courage to do it.

I am of a mind that if schools fail to perform their function, it is more efficient and more effective to close them and give others an opportunity to do better.  We closed dozens of large underperforming schools, primarily high schools, and replaced them with over 500 new small schools.  Those new small schools, according to research, are graduating students from high school at a rate of 8 percentage points more than the average school.  That was moving in the right direction.

What can schools do about factors affecting kids outside of school?

Schools have little control once the kids leave them.  Historically, we used that as an excuse for failure.  The better schools create opportunities for parents to feel welcome in the school and even begin to address the needs of the students’ families.  For example, they’ll offer immigration counseling or computer classes in the evening.  Some schools partner with community organizations that are able to deal with the needs of the whole family.   However, the truth is schools have limited capacity to have an impact on students’ families.

"I understand how critical a public education is. To my mind, that is the American ideal." -- Eric Nadelstern

Tell me more about schools that were going in the wrong direction and what went wrong.

I’ll give you some examples.  We closed Stevenson High school.  The school had 1800 student absences by Christmas, and no person in the building understood his responsibility.  The attitude was it is the parent’s job to make sure the kid comes to school.  In South Bronx High School, 20% of the kids made it to junior year.  I met with the Principal and his cabinet, and their attitude was shocking.  They did not understand why I was so disturbed by that statistic because it had always been that way.  If I wanted to see it any different, I would have to give them a better building;  I would have to give them better supplies and materials;  I would have to send them better teachers;  I would have to pay them more; and I would have to send them better kids.  If I sent them better kids, I would see how great they were.

At Morris High School there were 1700 kids enrolled.  1100 of them were freshmen.  Year after year, the DOE sent them hundreds of 9th graders, and most of those kids never made it out of 9th grade.  When I visited the school, one kid had written F… You in red letters across the back door of the building, and no one understood his responsibility to wipe that off as quickly as possible.

The astonishing thing is why there isn’t a greater sense of outrage from people who work in the system.  The reality is we are becoming inured to failure.  The people in the system are not necessarily the ones to blame for this.  It is the structure we have given them.  The rules and conditions under which they operate lead them to believe that nothing makes sense and nothing will ever change.

What would be the priority actions that you would take to improve the New York City public school system?

With our future as a nation at stake, we need to be bold for our schools to be successful with all children. What I would recommend is:

  1. Unzone all schools and give every child an equal opportunity by lottery to attend any school.
  2. Continue to close low performing large schools and replace them with campus communities of smaller, more successful ones.
  3. Decentralize authority to the school level and hold principals and teachers accountable for student performance.
  4. Encourage like-minded schools to network for purposes of mutual support and accountability.
  5. Significantly reduce central and field operations, and place the money saved directly into school budgets.
  6. Recruit and reward outstanding principals and teachers.
  7. Partner with not-for-profit organizations in the community to better serve students and their families.
  8. Support choice and competition represented by charter schools.
  9. Invite the private sector to compete in the world of K-12 education.

Eric Nadelstern and C. M. Rubin

Photos courtesy of NYC Department of Education and Eric Nadelstern

In The Global Search for Education, join me and globally renowned thought leaders including Sir Michael Barber (UK), Dr. Michael Block (US), Dr. Leon Botstein (US), Dr. Linda Darling-Hammond (US), Dr. Madhav Chavan (India), Professor Michael Fullan (Canada), Professor Howard Gardner (US), Professor Yvonne Hellman (The Netherlands), Professor Kristin Helstad (Norway), Jean Hendrickson (US), Professor Rose Hipkins (New Zealand), Professor Cornelia Hoogland (Canada), Mme. Chantal Kaufmann (Belgium), Professor Dominique Lafontaine (Belgium), Professor Hugh Lauder (UK), Professor Ben Levin (Canada), Professor Barry McGaw (Australia), Professor R. Natarajan (India), Dr. Denise Pope (US), Sridhar Rajagopalan (India), Dr. Diane Ravitch (US), Sir Ken Robinson (UK), Professor Pasi Sahlberg (Finland), Andreas Schleicher (PISA, OECD), Dr. Anthony Seldon (UK), Dr. David Shaffer (US), Dr. Kirsten Sivesind (Norway), Chancellor Stephen Spahn (US), Yves Theze (Lycee Francais US), Professor Charles Ungerleider (Canada), Professor Tony Wagner (US), Professor Dylan Wiliam (UK), Dr. Mark Wormald (UK), Professor Theo Wubbels (The Netherlands), Professor Michael Young (UK), and Professor Minxuan Zhang (China) as they explore the big picture education questions that all nations face today.
The Global Search for Education Community Page

C. M. Rubin is the author of two widely read online series for which she received a 2011 Upton Sinclair award, “The Global Search for Education” and “How Will We Read?”. She is also the author of three bestselling books, including The Real Alice in Wonderland.

Follow C. M. Rubin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@cmrubinworld

Comments


  1. tired teacher

    so how exactly am i as a teacher supposed to make my students come to school? or make them do their homework (I already only assign what i believe is necessary not busy work) and how am I to make them study when they care about nothing but their friends, what facebook comment is recent, and listening to their music?

    I am not some bitter entrenched educator, i spend all day desperately coming up with ways to engage them to interest them, and to keep them interested. But at some point they still need to do the hard work necessary.

    since based upon this article it is my responsibility to do that how am i supposed to?


  2. Linda Brees

    “They did not understand why I was so disturbed by that statistic because it had always been that way. If I wanted to see it any different, I would have to give them a better building; I would have to give them better supplies and materials; I would have to send them better teachers; I would have to pay them more; and I would have to send them better kids. If I sent them better kids, I would see how great they were.”

    Actually, all of that sounds reasonable to me. There is a limit to how much teachers and administrators can accomplish faced with indifference from parents and economic challenges of the kids. And any place that “private sector” has been invited to contribute to education, their contributions can be most optimistically described as “marginal.”


    • John Mark

      So Linda, what are your recommendations for fixing a mediocre system…or are you just going to criticize Nadelstern and go along with the excuse makers?


  3. Linda Brees

    Also, private sector already competes in K-12 education. I believe they are even known as “private” schools.


  4. Joe

    tiredteacher, I sympathize but being an educator is a job that goes beyond punching in, showing up and punching out. It requires more commitment or at least attention to problems of attendance and missed classes and disruptive classrooms. Nadelstern is faulting educators who shrug and throw up their hands at a problem without even considering any solutions for them. It is the complete lack of concern that he takes umbrage with. Nothing he said implies that he expects everyone employed by the NYC public school system to be supermen. But the attitude of “Well, not my problem!” has never really effected change either.


    • Conny

      (From an e-mail sent to RP 12/11/09)Dear RP Well, I have put this off about as long as I can stand it. I have tried to string toehegtr different beginnings, soulful endings and lots of other crap. The truth is, this is painful for all of us who love you. Like so much in life, this will be quite difficult but necessary.It would seem that the news is not good and that there are some time definitions laid on by your doctors. I am torn between swearing that they don’t know what they’re taliking about and sensing Peg’s quiet and soothing tone defining in your blog just what those words meant. As you have been dealing with this cancer over a long period, you have had to summon God knows how much strength in order to deal with it. But just because you’ve had practice doesn’t mean it is any easier now.I want you to know what you have given me. I want very much for you to take this in, because your gifts come as close to the core of who I believe I am as can be. The richness of being able to express my inner being, examine it, read it aloud and like what I hear hmyself saying, has given me inestimable joy. These gifts were not pedantic, or scholarly not even strictly definable. It was just you, with that crinkled smile, reading the lines, reacting to the movement within, reaching out for that audible blessing. And it goes far back, back to the hilltop and your words of praise after one of my theater performances, far back to that King Chapel speech when you encouraged all of us freshman (hey, who is this guy?) to throw away our traditional beanies and give up such dull-witted identities. Back to baby-sitting in the Dana living room with the girls, into long discussions lifting the night, seeing you in your South Hall office counselling or laughing or reading quietly.You have never failed to tell the truth. I can still hear the echo of your voice telling me, Patterson, you’re a survivor. You cut through whatever crisis I was going through at the time; I have recalled that observation many times duing my life. This essential core of comfort was something you gave everyone in your wide circle. Even after years of separation while watching you read at NYU, that particular gift kept right on giving. I am astonished at such constancy, dumfounded at the meaning your life has had for me. Such a generous life and spirit. My gratitude is just not possible to express, RP. Thank you so very much. You deserve to know what a difference you have made in so many lives. You have surely made a profound difference in mine. . .


  5. tired teacher

    joe, the problem is why do we assume that the majority of teachers have that attitude? that seems disingenuous and unfair. It is like the common assumption that there are a greater number of “bad” teachers employed then there are bad workers in any other job.

    also why is it that the idea of “punching the clock” is acceptable when applied to other professions, yet from teachers we expect more while paying less?

    and this isn’t about money, it is about support, we are expected to work as much as a lawyer, solve all the problems of society, and shut up and take it while people rip our competency, our intelligence, and our dedication. All the while solutions we know would work, addressing problems we know are at the foundation of all of this never happens because someone who isn’t an educator always knows better.


    • John Mark

      So tired teacher, I don’t see your suggestions either. At least Nadelstern has the cajones to make some recommendations. Your approach isn’t constructive.


  6. Barry Stern

    Eric Nadelstern was a tremendous asset to the NYC schools, and his priority actions make all kinds of sense. I only wish he had made two additional recommendations:
    1. Do not invest more in trying to perfect the factory model high school. This century-old model simply cannot do better than it has, and principals who have only experienced this model have little idea of what is possible with alternative designs. For example, there are blended classroom-online models that feature instruction that is very intensive, cross-disciplinary, team taught, computer-assisted, highly experiential and applied to solving problems frequently seen the modern workplace. The instructors and students remain together for the entire instructional day instead of changing subjects and workgroups every 45 minutes in response to a bell. One such model that leaves the factory model behind achieves 2-3 grade level gains in math and reading in only 2-3 months. Kids are engaged since the staff knows you don’t get rigor without establishing relationships and relevance. To establish these 2 Rs students are taught to identify their preferred thinking style(s) and use it/them to learn faster and work effectively with others with other preferred styles. They also learn how to use needs-based communication to foster healthy inter-personal relations, build teams and resolve conflicts. Parents are also invited to learn some of the same relationship building skills to support their children by lowering the emotional load at home.
    2. Clean up the corrupt NYC school procurement system. This is Exhibit A of a bureaucracy run amok. Bidders for contracts must jump through an inordinate number of hoops before principals can even look at what they have to offer. Result: only the well-connected and well-financed get contracts. Unfortunately, such firms tend to offer more of the same. No wonder NYC schools aren’t progressing faster after a wonderful start under Joel Klein and Eric Nadelstern.


    • John Mark

      Barry, I agree with you fully. Point 1 is what the most advanced international education systems are focused on, such as Finland’s. It is clearly where education will go and the opportunity for the clunker systems to dig out of the basement, such as the NYC public schools. Point 2 is just about healthy economic competition in a free society. This is not Italy, beholden to the old guard and cronyism, which has stifled their economic growth for decades. Or is it?

Leave a comment

Tuesday

January 17th, 2012

Recent News

Career Index

Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.

View All