Schools Enlist Parents to Improve Students’ Readiness Every Day
Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
The standardized testing regime in place in Texas is getting a second look after receiving criticism from a large portion of the education community, The Dallas Morning News reports. Over 880 school districts have petitioned lawmakers for relief from the requirements of a test system that many are claiming is too onerous and not effective [...]

The standardized testing regime in place in Texas is getting a second look after receiving criticism from a large portion of the education community, The Dallas Morning News reports. Over 880 school districts have petitioned lawmakers for relief from the requirements of a test system that many are claiming is too onerous and not effective in assessing student performance.
A number of options are on the table, from a complete rewrite of the testing program to a two-year moratorium to consider alternatives. Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and House Speaker Joe Straus have already indicated that changes are coming in at least some form, saying that a new system could be in place as early as next academic year.
“To parents and educators concerned about excessive testing, the Texas House has heard you,” Straus said as the 2013 session opened. “We will continue to hold our schools accountable. But we will also make sure that our accountability and testing system is more appropriate, more flexible and more reasonable.”
Dewhurst has said the number of tests high school students have to pass — currently 15 end-of-course exams — will be reduced.
He said that 15 exams was too many, though he did not commit to an alternative number. Individual subject exams are likely to draw the most scrutiny in the upcoming overhaul.
Educators, parents and other advocates are raising concerns with the newly implemented State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness system that went into effect last year. It was designed to make sure that Texas high schoolers were graduating ready for college, but critics say that it sets to bar too high.
Based on results of the exams given to 9th graders last year, there’s every reason to believe that students will struggle to meet the testing standards once they hit high school. There are also problems anticipated among students in earlier grades who will now have to pass standardized exams to be promoted in 5th grade and in the 8th.
Parent groups and school districts have cited the STAAR as indicative of the overemphasis on testing in Texas and are calling on the Legislature — which originally approved the STAAR — to pull back.
“These high-stakes tests create unnecessary barriers to graduation, take valuable classroom instruction time, and divert significant public funding to a for-profit testing company instead of the classroom,” said one parent group that is lobbying for change — Texans Advocating for Meaningful Student Assessment. The group wants lawmakers to reduce the number of tests required for graduation to “no more than two or three.”
Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
by John Jensen, PhD The debate over high-stakes testing pits the need for assessing student... Read More
Teachers and parents spoke out at the Denver Public Schools board meeting about the... Read More
Researchers are expecting a surge in the number of students educated at home by their parents over... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
According to the article there are 15 exams. These exams are spread over 4 years which means a student will take 3 or 4 exams per year. The exams provide a minimum quality control on the education of the students in the tested courses. I doubt that the exam takes more than one class period to administer. If the students have been successfully learning the material throughout the year, they should be able to pass the exam.
You might want to read up on this issue, or talk to some teachers you know before weighing in with wild guesses.
I left teaching (grades 4 & 5) for a STEM field exclusively because of the onerous standardized testing. In the 3 different districts I taught in (all in TX), the testing dominated all aspects of our curriculum. This was true for students and teachers. We spent most of our professional meeting time on testing related things that no teachers or administrators believed was in the best interests of our students, but we had to – it was state and federal law. The need for more test prep time even ended recess in one of those districts. In the classroom, testing prep shaped our curriculum, mandated specifically by both the state and the district. It prevented us from focusing on real learning entirely in favor of whatever might bring up test scores, even if those scores were merely reflective of successful (non-cheating) gaming of the test itself. The students and the teachers had a lot of trouble believing in much of what we spent our time on.
Interestingly, I have spoken to several of the teachers that influenced me growing up that were teaching since well before our state’s transition to all standardized testing all the time, and they say similar things. And on a final note, teaching I have done since at a college level during my career switch has convinced me that large numbers of our students who are coming out the other end of our testing-dominated system are ill-prepared for all but the most rote tasks, requiring significant remediation.