Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
Supt. Deasy Calls Brown’s Plan for LA Schools ‘Risky’
Los Angeles Superintendent John Deasy has criticized Gov. Jerry Brown’s tax initiative meant to prevent cuts in the department of education budget.
LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy has criticized California Governor Jerry Brown’s strategy to balance next year’s budget by asking local voters to approve a parcel tax and approve a separate tax increase.
It is thought that Deasy is uncomfortable, as the district – which in its budget crisis has seen the loss of thousands of jobs – faces hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts if either measure fails to come to fruition, writes Howard Blume at the Los Angeles Times.
After several years of cuts, “there is not a single, solitary thing in this budget that can and should be reduced.
“The rights of youth are completely imperiled if not outright violated” by the level of public support of education.
California governor Jerry Brown is urging voters not to reject the tax increases he’s trying to establish for the November ballot, warning that the alternative would mean cuts of up to $4.8 billion for public schools. Brown’s budget looks to close the current gap through a combination of spending cuts and tax increases that would kick in at year’s end. It is believed this measure would provide $4.4 billion in revenue – but there is no guarantee voters would approve.
Despite this, officials are said to be advising school districts to budget based on the scenario that voters would see eye to eye with the Governor on the plan, said district lobbyist Edgar Zazueta.
But not everyone shares the Governor’s optimism.
“There are several pretty serious unknowns at the moment,” Deasy said.
A contingent of about 50 parents and others from at least three highly regarded schools attended the school meeting at which Deasy spoke. They were there to urge officials to reverse their vote to remove funding that had served students from low-income families.
In raising Title I poverty levels, the school board has decided to divide the money instead among schools that serve a higher percentage of low-income families.
“It’s unconscionable to take these funds away from us,” said parent Loretta Slonim.
Under new guidelines, at least 50% of students at a school have to qualify for the aid for the school to receive the funding, writes Blume.
When discussing the bridging the achievement gap separating high- and low-income students, parent Alex Wald said, “Our schools have done an exceptional job”.
But Wald added:
“Many of the gains that they have achieved will be lost.”
by John Jensen, PhD The debate over high-stakes testing pits the need for assessing student... Read More
Teachers and parents spoke out at the Denver Public Schools board meeting about the... Read More
Researchers are expecting a surge in the number of students educated at home by their parents over... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
- Select a City Subject
- Art Schools in Dallas
- Art Schools in Denison
- Art Schools in Kilgore
- Art Schools in Nacogdoches
- Biology Schools in Bolivar
- Biology Schools in Canton
- Biology Schools in Cape Girardeau
- Biology Schools in Chesterfield
- Biology Schools in Columbia
- Biology Schools in Fayette
- Biology Schools in Fulton
- Biology Schools in Hannibal
- Biology Schools in Jefferson City
- Biology Schools in Joplin
- Biology Schools in Kansas City
- Biology Schools in Kirksville
- Biology Schools in Liberty
- Biology Schools in Marshall
- Biology Schools in Maryville
- Biology Schools in Neosho
- Biology Schools in Point Lookout
- Biology Schools in Rolla
- Biology Schools in Saint Charles
- Biology Schools in Saint Joseph
- Biology Schools in Saint Louis
- Biology Schools in Springfield
- Biology Schools in Union
- Biology Schools in Warrensburg