Schools Enlist Parents to Improve Students’ Readiness Every Day
Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
Teresa Ruiz’ tenure reform bill passed unanimously but ultimately had to compromise with the NJEA and allow seniority based layoffs to continue.
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie’s education reforms are continuing with the unanimous passing of State Senator Teresa Ruiz’ tenure reform bill in the Senate Thursday. It is expected to be signed into law by Christie sometime next week.
The effect will be that teachers who under-perform in the classroom can finally be removed from their posts. Also, evaluation of their performance will be linked to the progress of their students; progress measured in part by test scores.
Ruiz has spent much of the last two years working on the reform, according to NJ.com and the unanimous passing indicates the work that has gone into forging consensus on the issue. Democratic support for the measure goes against their traditional union supporters, but an injection of funds by billionaire David Tepper reportedly encouraged the New Jersey Education Association to relent to the changes.
The current situation is increasingly seen as morally indefensible. Protecting bad teachers when almost 50% of kids fail to graduate high school in failing urban districts is politically impossible.
One big caveat to the deal: To get it done, reformers had to abandon the fight against seniority rules. The NJEA insisted on that and sadly carried the day. So in cities such as Newark, which face hundreds of layoffs in the next few years, young teachers will soon be fired en masse, including even those who are gifted and hardworking.
So while this is an important battle for Christie and other reformer to win the war is far from over. Seniority is the line in the sand for unions and their Democratic supporters. Senate President Stephen Sweeney feared that if seniority rules were abolished districts would take advantage of the savings yielded by firing experienced teachers and replacing them with new recruits to ease budgetary pressure during an on-going recession.
In the meantime there are measures which reformers can press for to chip away at seniority until the political will and means are gathered to abolish it entirely:
If the law really can’t be changed, perhaps the damage can be contained. Local chapters of the NJEA should be allowed to give up seniority rights during negotiations, for example, a concession now banned by law. Superintendents in failing districts could be allowed to select a certain number of “all-star” teachers who are shielded from layoffs, even without seniority.
Tuesday
June 26th, 2012
Filed Under
Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
by John Jensen, PhD The debate over high-stakes testing pits the need for assessing student... Read More
Teachers and parents spoke out at the Denver Public Schools board meeting about the... Read More
Researchers are expecting a surge in the number of students educated at home by their parents over... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
It will not make a whit of difference. To repeat, Churchill said “Americans will always do the right thing – after they have tried everything else.
Seniority is the Prime Directive for unions. It is more basic than any other union idea. It was established to fight favouritism which was rampant at the turn of the century. Without it favouritism runs rampant. LIFO will be the last thing unions ever give up.
That’s funny, Doug. The real world (the 93% of us NOT in unions) don’t deal with “rampant favoritism.” I’m guessing you are Canadian, or European based on your spelling of the word, so unionism is akin to the bible to you. Companies only show one type of favoritism, they reword those who are the most effective, and remove those who do a lousy job.