Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
Mich. Teacher Says New Bill Will Wreck Her Retirement Plans
SB1040: Testimony at a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee that teachers will have to wait to retire at 60 has provoked derision from taxpayers and businesses.
A Michigan English teacher at Saginaw Township Community School District is upset that she won’t be able to retire at 47 as she had previously planned if SB 1040, introduced by Senator Kahn last month and current in the Senate Appropriations Committee, becomes law. It will require public school employees to contribute a minimum of 5% of their compensation to their retirement plan and be 60 before receiving health care benefits. This means that instead of another 3 years of service the 44 year old teacher will have to work another 16 years in order to be eligible for health benefits.
Terri List was one of the critics of the bill highlighted by the Michigan Education Association.
“By the time I’m 60, I would have put in 43 years of service, earning a salary at the top of the pay scale. How does that save the district money? You could hire two people for the cost of one and encourage young people to join the profession. Right now, I would not recommend to my pupils to become a teacher in Michigan.”
Michael Van Beek of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy pointed out that Ms List’s math only made sense if she had bought ‘years of service’ instead of completing them all and that this practice is essentially extinct in the private sector.
Although many of the people testifying before the Senate Appropriations Retirement Subcommittee claimed that the proposed bill was unfair and an unjustified attack on school employee retirement benefits, many interested parties outside the profession were stunned by the criticisms. Leon Drolet, chairman of the Michigan Taxpayers Alliance said:
“Wow. They have reached the politicians’ level of entitlement,” Drolet said. “She thinks she is entitled to retire at 47? Holy smokes. I don’t know what more to say to that. A government employee thinking that 47 is a reasonable expectation to retire shows just how deep inside their own bubble they live, insulated from the real world.”
While Charles Owens, Michigan chapter president of the National Federation of Independent Businesses remarked that Ms List was indeed correct:
“If you want to retire if you are 47, apparently teaching is not the place to go,”
The Subcommittee meets again April 19th and the bill is said to be on the fast track with hopes of it being completed before June.
by John Jensen, PhD The debate over high-stakes testing pits the need for assessing student... Read More
Teachers and parents spoke out at the Denver Public Schools board meeting about the... Read More
Researchers are expecting a surge in the number of students educated at home by their parents over... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
- Select a City Subject
- Business Administration Schools in Athens
- Business Administration Schools in Canyon
- Business Administration Schools in Cisco
- Business Administration Schools in Denison
- Business Administration Schools in El Paso
- Business Administration Schools in McAllen
- Business Administration Schools in Midland
- Business Administration Schools in Nacogdoches
- Business Administration Schools in Pasadena
- Business Administration Schools in Port Arthur
- Business Administration Schools in Texarkana
- Business Administration Schools in Uvalde