IES Releases Condition of Education 2013 Report
The Institute of Education Sciences and the National Center for Education Statistics have released... Read More
Cleveland wants to establish a system tying pay raises to teacher performance instead of years of experience.
As negotiations continue between the Cleveland schools and teachers union, merit pay for teachers is a main issue, but dscussion could potentially restore at least some of the $13 million in cuts made Tuesday and avoid larger cuts next year, writes Patrick O’Donnell at The Plain Dealer.
District officials asked the state legislature over the summer to institute a merit pay system. That didn’t happen, but Mayor Frank Jackson has continued to call for “systemic changes” in teacher pay.
Negotiation documents show that the district continued to press for merit pay. The documents from the State Employment Relations Board (SERB) also show that the district, as of August, was seeking pay cuts of 10 percent, along with eliminating 13 paid holiday and training days and having teachers pay 20 percent of health costs.
The Cleveland school board voted to make $13.1 million in cuts to comply with the state’s requirement. The cuts include eliminating preschool and busing for high school students after January, wiping out summer school and cutting extracurricular activities and spring sports, other than baseball and softball, which are independently funded.
Cleveland Teachers Union President David Quolke said that his union has offered concessions in the last two weeks that would spare many of this year’s cuts, but he declined to offer details.
Jackson said that “piecemeal” and short-term wage concessions won’t solve future deficits.
“Our issues are systemic,” Jackson said. “Even if there was an agreement reached as far as this year’s budget, we’d be facing a much larger deficit next year.”
Merit pay and teacher evaluation have been major issues across the state. The legislature ordered the state school board to set a teacher evaluation plan by the end of the year that uses measures of student academic growth, like test scores, to make up 50 percent of a teacher’s rating.
Monday
October 31st, 2011
Filed Under
The Institute of Education Sciences and the National Center for Education Statistics have released... Read More
Minneapolis based consulting and research firm Adventium Labs has developed an educational iOS game... Read More
It seemed like less than a decade ago that the popularity of high school exit exams was at its... Read More
More groups are saying that the time and expense dedicated to standardized testing is having... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
i agree with that paying system…teacher should paid by his or her effort, other than experience…
Hey Jasonwood
Well it could work if not for so many other factors.
Teachers manipulating to obtain the best and brightest
in their class and leave the rest to us. Administrators constantly pressuring us to give good grades.
Teachers avoiding schools whose populations are
challanging and hard to reach and leaving the job to
us. Just to many variables to implement a fair system.
[...] This post was Twitted by Become_Teacher [...]
Merit pay is as dumb as a bag of hammers. Bloomberg got rid of it, Have they read the Vanderbilt study.? Tried and tried over and over-never works.
The entire teaching profssion rejects it. There is not some subset dying for merit pay. Teachers do not believe in competition with each other. They believe in moving forward in lock-step. This cannot be force-fed.