Judge Rules in Favor of Indiana Choice Scholarship Program

A Marion County Superior Court Judge has rejected challenges to the Indiana Choice Scholarship Program, with 4000 students continuing to attend private schools.

Marion County Superior Court Judge Michael Keele has ruled that the Indiana Choice Scholarship Program is legal and has rejected every claim against the program brought by the plaintiffs in the Meredith v. Daniels trial.

Keele ruled in favor of both the state and two parents, Heather Coffy and Monica Poindexter, who have intervened in the lawsuit – which was backed by both state and national teachers’ unions – in defense of the program.

Coffy and Poindexter were represented by the Institute for Justice (IJ).

The court previously rejected the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction against the Choice Scholarship Program until the court reached a final decision on the constitutionality of the program.

But now this ruling closes the litigation at court level, at least, meaning that the almost 4,000 students who have received Choice Scholarships can continue to be able to attend the private schools.

The court dismissed the plaintiffs argument, saying that the Choice Scholarship Program “is not in place ‘for the benefit’ of religious schools.”

Judge Keele ruled that “the CSP bestows benefits onto scholarship recipients who may then choose to use the funding for education at a public, secular private, or religious private school.”

Institute for Justice Senior Attorney Bert Gall said:

“Today’s ruling is a resounding win for Indiana parents and students, and it is a major defeat for school choice opponents.

“The court’s well-reasoned decision makes clear that the Choice Scholarship Program is constitutional and that the teachers’ unions’ lawsuit against it is completely meritless.”

Heather Coffy, a mom of three children who have received Choice Scholarships, said:

“Thanks to today’s ruling, I and thousands of other parents across the state of Indiana can continue to choose schools for our children that best suit their educational needs.”

IJ Senior Attorney Dick Komer said:

“The court got it exactly right:  While the Choice Scholarship Program is inconsistent with the self-serving agenda of the teachers’ unions who are supporting this lawsuit, it is perfectly consistent with the Indiana Constitution.

“We expect the teachers’ unions to appeal, but we are confident that the trial court’s decision will be affirmed.”

The decision echoes Indiana’s long tradition of providing choice-based aid to students who choose to attend private schools and colleges.  The ruling that upholds the Choice Scholarship Program would secure scholarship programs at the higher education level, as well as textbook and transportation-assistance programs for children who attend private schools, says a press release.

“Indiana’s Choice Scholarship Program is about providing true educational choice to Indiana families,” said Chip Mellor, the Institute’s president and general counsel.

“As the court recognized, the Indiana Constitution does not forbid programs like the Choice Scholarship Program.  That’s why the teachers’ unions’ lawsuit failed, and why it will continue to fail if they appeal.”

Comments


  1. Linda Brees

    This decision is ridiculous. Tax dollars should not go to funding religious schools. And because these “scholarships” both draw funds away from the public school system and don’t actually cover the full tuition for private schools, it is basically another government handout to richer parents at the expense of the poor. Some “choice” this is when poor kids who are true victims of poor public education don’t really have any choice at all.


  2. Brit

    Agreed Linda. In all other situations and cases they want to enforce the separation of church and state. But for some reason the want to overlook it in this situation when it comes to using taxpayers hard earned money to fund religious schools.

    http://www.myeducationhelp.com


  3. Thomas M.

    A great win for parents and students! To the contrary, this does not “fund religious schools”. This simply gives parents the option to choose what is best for their child, whether it be public, private secular, or private religious. Many financially challenged parents/families can not afford an education in a private school, secular or religious, and this aids those parents who want to choose to send their child to a private school. There are many factors that go into that choice for a parent beyond religious or non-religious affiliation. This bill is about aiding financially strapped families and providing an option for quality education to their children. This does not provide a “handout to the rich” as there are income qualifications. http://www.doe.in.gov/sites/default/files/school-choice/household-income-limits_0.pdf A word to the wise: Please choose your words wisely and know what you are talking about rather than ranting poorly thought out answers on a public forum.

Leave a comment

Friday

January 20th, 2012

Recent News

Career Index

Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.

View All