Alice – Victoria!
C. M. Rubin explores the Victorian Extravaganza in Llandudno, Wales, and the fascinating history... Read More
New data has shown that many high poverty schools are being shortchanged by their districts — despite federal law ruling otherwise.
Nine out of every 10 students at Hiawassee Elementary in Orange County live in poverty. And federal data shows that the school district spends about $2,065 on teachers per student. However, the county’s Lake Whitney Elementary, which has a statistically more well-off student-base, spends more than a third more — $2,710 — on staffing per student.
Across Central Florida, districts spend less per pupil to staff many of their highest-poverty schools despite federal rules intended to make sure every poor school gets its fair share, writes Lauren Roth at the Orlando Sentinel.
“Too many children living below the poverty line are getting shortchanged,” U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said.
“When children who need more get less, that’s what we’re concerned about.”
The data suggests that this spending difference is because the poorer schools often hire teachers that are less experienced and paid less money.
“The current rules allow districts to prove schools are being treated comparably if they are each given the same number of staffers per student and follow the same pay scale, regardless of their salary or experience level,” writes Roth.
Duncan called that standard a loophole that “undermines Title I.”
Jennifer Gramzinski, principal at Hiawassee Elementary since 2009, said her students struggle with emotional needs that children at wealthier schools do not.
“It’s hard to get them to pay attention to math and English when they have so many challenges at home,” she said.
Her school uses grant money and Title I dollars to provide extra guidance staff and tutors. But in the face of current cuts, she is facing the prospect of losing them.
Nationwide, 46 percent of high-poverty elementary schools spent less per student on staffing than wealthier schools according to the U.S. Department of Education study.
Duncan pointed out that some school districts are distributing money much more equally than the average, with about 1 in 4 school districts would not be in compliance with the new rules.
And it is believed that school-based spending of a few percent would level the playing field.
“It’s not much, but it’s a little something” that could increase the experience level and average pay at a school, said Marjorie Murray, who oversees Title I for the county school district.
C. M. Rubin explores the Victorian Extravaganza in Llandudno, Wales, and the fascinating history... Read More
Republican Presidential nominee Mitt Romney has blasted the Democrats' record on education and made... Read More
Up to 20% of CA school districts and LEAs may be unable to pay their bills either this year or... Read More
C. M. Rubin discusses the origin of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and its connection with... Read More
The way we used to teach math mirrors our effective interventions for those students struggling as... Read More
C.M. Rubin interviews the leaders of the major publishers, retailers and e-tailers, as well as the... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
Do poorer schools spend less money on staffing than wealthy schools or do poorer schools spend less money on staffing than the average in the state?
It says that teachers with more experience which results in higher salary move from high poverty schools to schools whose students have fewer challenges at home.