Duncan’s NCLB Failure Prediction Wrong, Overestimated by 30%

Arne Duncan famously announced that he believed the NCLB Act would see 82% of schools fail, but the Center on Education Policy says otherwise.


Earlier this year U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan issued the warning that 82 percent of schools would fail to make the grade this year under the No Child Left Behind Act in an attempt to encourage Congress to rewrite the law. But a new report from the Center on Education Policy estimates that the real number is closer to 48 percent, writes Michele McNeil at Ed Week.

The proportion of schools that are estimated to have failed to make “adequate yearly progress” (AYP) under NCLB during the 2010-11 school year is up from 39 percent the year before. Duncan’s 82 percent prediction, which was criticized at the time for only serving to create an atmosphere of fear and damage the department’s credibility, appears to be off-base.

Duncan may have originally used this 82 percent figure to try and stimulate Congress into reauthorizing the law. It didn’t work, meaning the Department of Education began issuing waivers from key elements of NCLB.

Duncan commented on the report’s data:

 ”Whether it’s 50 percent, 80 percent, or 100 percent of schools being incorrectly labeled as failing, one thing is clear: No Child Left Behind is broken,” he said. “That’s why we’re moving forward with giving states flexibility from the law in exchange for reforms that drive student success.”

Only three states, plus the District of Columbia, actually hit or exceeded Duncan’s estimate on failure to make adequate yearly progress: the District of Columbia, at 87 percent; Florida; at 89 percent; Missouri, at 88 percent; and New Mexico, at 87 percent.

Interestingly, while states like Wisconsin, Kansas and Rhode Island far surpassed the expectations of schools making the progress, the report shows that it doesn’t necessarily mean they have better K-12 systems.

Instead, the difference in AYP success is likely more a reflection of test difficulty, cut scores, student demographics, and the academic targets, writes McNeil.

Comments


  1. Linda Brees

    It’s unfortunate that Duncan’s estimate was so far off, but his mathematics probably took into account that states will not try to cheat and manipulate their scores. If NCLB is supposed to give Americans an accurate view of the quality of their schools, then it has failed. Not a big surprise, of course, as failing was what this god-forsaken piece of legislation was basically designed to do.


  2. Joe

    Yes, it could be a huge conspiracy on the part of school districts to subvert the testing standards of the NCLB. Or it could be that Arne Duncan is just bad at math or misunderstands the fundamentals of the law.


  3. Joe

    I admit, Duncan would make an appealing Norma Desmond! “I’m still right! It’s just the reality that got all wrong!”

Leave a comment

Tuesday

December 20th, 2011

Recent News

Career Index

Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.

View All