School Choice Popularity Growing Steadily in Wisconsin
School choice is a growing movement in Wisconsin as parents increasingly take advantage of... Read More
The debate over Common Core Standards continues in the run up to the end of Obama’s first term as POTUS. Are they an intrusion into state’s business?
Two years ago 46 states and the District of Columbia adopted the Common Core national math and reading standards, but the debate over whether they’re appropriate rambles on.
The academic standards have been heavily promoted by the current Obama administration and are widely perceived as a prerequisite for successful application to its Race to the Top education grant program. While not a strict precondition, states adopting the voluntary common standards do receive bonus points in their application.
Conservative opponents of the standards claim that they represent an unjustifiable federal intrusion into education matters that should the sole domain of the States concerned.
“The Common Core takes education out of the hands of South Carolina and parents, so we have no control over what happens in the classroom,” said Michael Fair, a Republican state senator who plans to introduce a measure that would bar his state from spending money on activities related to the standards, such as training teachers and purchasing textbooks.
It’s not a clear partisan divide however as some on the left are against the measures because of the extra work burden they place on already undervalued teachers, while some on the right, such as the right-leaning Thomas B. Fordham Institute, accept that the Common Core standards are of themselves widely superior to the standards currently in use in the majority of states.
One supporter of the measures on the ground is teacher Jahn Owens who, despite acknowledging the concerns of some of her union peers other the extra work caused by their implantation is happy that her students are benefiting:
“These standards take students much deeper into the subjects and force them to do more critical thinking,” Ms. Owens said. “It’s been hard work for the teachers because the implementation was so quick, but we are now more purposeful about student learning.”
There is also a group who believe the implantation is a waste of time as the common standards will have no effect. A researcher from the Brooking Institution think tank released a study this year that showed there was no correlation between quality of standards and improvement of national math and reading scores; states with high and low standard showed the same rate of improvement from 2003-09.
Common Core standards are a result of a push from the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers to describe the skills that all students should possess as a result of a world class education. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the high profile funders and the standards set specific detailed goals so progress can be accurately and quantifiably compared in different districts.
School choice is a growing movement in Wisconsin as parents increasingly take advantage of... Read More
According to data collected from Ohio’s new value-added teacher ratings, there appears to be... Read More
Lawmakers in Dubai hope that forcing schools and parents to sign a legally binding contract before... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
Yes
It seems like states opposing the Common Core standards are often doing so for the wrong reasons. They are not always opposed because standards limit teachers’ freedom in the classroom and lead to fact-centered testing, but because national standards decrease state educational autonomy. Which doesn’t necessarily have to do with what’s best for students.
Sarah
smallerquestions.org
Autonomy may be whats best for students when states such as SD, MT, ND continually produce top quality students and do it the old fashioned way; by relying on good solid and supportive communities and parents, which can not be legislated. Why should states, districts, or schools that succeed be limited by the feds?
I understand the concern about federal intrusion in schools, but the Common Core Standards is a state-driven proposal–governors and state chief school officers developed the concept and moved it forward. The federal department of education certainly likes the idea, but that is really beside the point. The CCSs aren’t a federal intrusion but an excellent example of states working collaboratively and cooperatively to solve a problem.
Or they were part of Race to the Top and schools scrambling for money had almost no choice but to adopt them in order to stay afloat.
if there was some sort of trickle down effect, if the common core told you very generally what students should learn, then states were able to create the details from that for themselves (hopefully by the teachers and not more bureaucrats) it would be a good system
of course if they are too general what do they really mean etc… etc…
The problem is that “common core” will become a ceiling and not a floor.