Schools Enlist Parents to Improve Students’ Readiness Every Day
Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
Bill 191 would see half a teacher’s evaluation score made up from student test results, with the other half by more traditional supervisor reviews.
Colorado teachers are unhappy with the new evaluation standard soon to be introduced throughout the state, InTheseTimes.com reports. A new law, passed last spring, called “The Great Teachers and Leaders Law,” would not only overhaul the teacher tenure system, but would also introduce a new evaluation program where student achievement will count for half of a teacher’s final score.
Although both teachers and administrators believe that some changes to the teacher evaluations were needed, especially since the old system wasn’t good at identifying areas that needed improvement, they say that the provisions laid down by the new law go too far.
When the new law, also known as Bill 191, goes into effect, half of the teacher’s performance will be based on their students’ test scores, and the other half will come from supervisor reviews. According to the Denver Post, the new evaluations will also play a part in the revised tenure system, making it easier for poorly rated teachers to lose their job protection.
The supporters of the new system say that such drastic changes are long overdue, in light of the fact that, evaluated by the previous standard, only 32 teachers were deemed unsatisfactory over a three-year period. Kathleen Boyd, who testified in front of the lawmakers during the debate over Bill 191, said quality of education in Colorado, and specifically Denver, are never going to improve until a way is found to remove tired, burnt-out, and ineffective teachers.
“I don’t need a law that guarantees me a job, and other teachers don’t either,” the new teacher said, a room full of teachers behind her, some of them shaking their heads during her testimony to the Senate Education Committee. “I can take care of that on my own.”
The aspect of the bill that drew the most opposition, was the retooling of the system that grants teachers tenure. Currently, any teacher who completes three years of teaching satisfactorily will be granted tenure, but the law seeks to change the qualification for tenure to three years of teaching “effectively,” although the meaning of effectiveness hasn’t yet been defined. On the flip side, if a tenured teacher is found to be “ineffective” over two years, he or she will lose tenure and may be fired at will after a one-year probationary period.
Although lawmakers agree that the new bill will go far towards making sure students are surrounded by dedicated teachers and skilled administrators, and this will inevitably lead to increased academic achievement, opponents urge caution. Basing such big part of teacher rating on standardized test scores doesn’t create an ideal learning environment, instead committing all the teachers who want to keep their jobs to teaching nothing but the test.
Tuesday
September 27th, 2011
Filed Under
Educators are finding that kids aren’t coming to school prepared to learn because they are... Read More
by John Jensen, PhD The debate over high-stakes testing pits the need for assessing student... Read More
Teachers and parents spoke out at the Denver Public Schools board meeting about the... Read More
Researchers are expecting a surge in the number of students educated at home by their parents over... Read More
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
Comments
Before Bill 191 passed, I must admit that I adamantly opposed it. As a teacher, I agreed with those above that challenged it because it focused too much on imperfect standardized test scores. I also found it strange that they passed this bill without defining exactly what an “effective teacher” was or the process in which someone would evaluate the teachers. In short, I thought, and continue to think, that this bill could be detrimental to our students if the details were to be ironed out by people far removed from the classroom. This is exactly why I have decided to take power into my own hands. I have joined a group of teacher leaders called the New Millennium Initiative who are all interested in making this bill as productive as possible. While not all of the teachers within this group initially opposed this bill as I did, we agree that in order to make SB 191 effective, we need to have teachers be the leading voices in those that help move this bill from theory to practice. With adequate teacher voice, I am starting to think that this bill could actually elevate the teaching profession by making sure that we retain the most effective teachers stay in the classroom and ensuring that all teachers are supported through purposeful feedback. I am seeing that this bill could be what those who initially supported it said it would be, but only with teacher input. My advice then? Teachers, speak up. Policy-makers, listen.
Why don’t we apply this type of law to police, firefighters, and other public workers. We can give them impossible criteria to meet, rate them as unsatisfactory on the evaluation, then fire them and hire younger, cheaper workers. Don’t stop at education, let’s go for the penny a pound capitalsim model.
What do we have to lose? only a nation…