Home | EdNewsToday | Many Nations Passing U.S. in Education, Expert Says

Add to:    Add to your del.icio.us del.icio.us   Digg this story Digg

Many Nations Passing U.S. in Education, Expert Says

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image

3.10.10 - A Senate panel learned that more students in more countries graduate from high school and college and score higher on achievement tests than students in the United States.

Many Nations Passing U.S. in Education, Expert Says

A Senate panel learned that more students in more countries graduate from high school and college and score higher on achievement tests than students in the United States.

One of the world’s foremost experts on comparing national school systems told lawmakers on Tuesday that many other countries were surpassing the United States in educational attainment, including Canada, where he said 15-year-old students were, on average, more than one school year ahead of American 15-year-olds.

America’s education advantage, unrivaled in the years after World War II, is eroding quickly as a greater proportion of students in more and more countries graduate from high school and college and score higher on achievement tests than students in the United States, said Andreas Schleicher, a senior education official at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in Paris, which helps coordinate policies for 30 of the world’s richest countries.

“Among O.E.C.D. countries, only New Zealand, Spain, Turkey and Mexico now have lower high school completion rates than the U.S.,” Mr. Schleicher said. About 7 in 10 American students get a high school diploma.

Mr. Schleicher’s comments came in testimony before the Senate education committee and in a statement he delivered. The panel plans to rewrite the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the main law governing federal policy on public schools.

The committee also heard from Dennis Van Roekel, president of the National Education Association, the largest teachers’ union; John Castellani, president of the Business Roundtable, a group that represents corporate executives; and Charles Butt, chief executive of a supermarket chain in Texas, who said employers there faced increasing difficulties in hiring qualified young workers.

The blame for America’s sagging academic achievement does not lie solely with public schools, Mr. Butt said, but also with dysfunctional families and a culture that undervalues education. “Schools are inheriting an overentertained, distracted student,” he said.

Senator Tom Harkin, the Iowa Democrat who leads the Senate Committee, picked up on that comment. “Overentertained and distracted — that’s right,” Mr. Harkin said. “The problem lies with many kids before they get to school, and if we don’t crack that nut, we’re going to continue to patch and fill.”

Mr. Schleicher based many of his international comparisons on data from the O.E.C.D. Program for International Student Assessment, which tests students in scores of countries every three years in math, reading or science.

He said Finland had the world’s “best performing education system,” partly because of its highly effective way of recruiting, training and supporting teachers.

South Korea, he said, which was in economic ruin after World War II, today is an economic dynamo partly because of its educational attainment, which, among other measures, has achieved a 96 percent high school graduation rate, the world’s highest.

Poland, Mr. Schleicher said, is improving its education system most rapidly. In less than a decade, it raised the literacy skills of its 15-year-olds by the equivalent of almost a school year. “If the U.S. would raise the performance of schools by a similar amount,” he said, “that could translate into a long-term economic value of over 40 trillion dollars.”

America’s system of standards, curriculums and testing controlled by states and local districts with a heavy overlay of federal rules is a “quite unique” mix of decentralization and central control, Mr. Schleicher said. More successful nations, he said, maintain central control over standards and curriculum, but give local schools more freedom from regulation, he said.

“The question for the U.S. is not just how many charter schools it establishes,” he said, “but how to build the capacity for all schools to assume charter-like autonomy, as happens in some of the best-performing education systems.”

“In one way, international education benchmarks make disappointing reading for the U.S.,” he said.

 

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (7 posted):

GilNGarcia on 10/03/2010 08:11:26
avatar
It surely is no surprise to note the latest estimates. One very crude measure I use is the large number of student groups and families with school-age children who seem to come to Washington DC earlier and earlier in the school year. So, the question is, "How many days do these kids go to school in a given "school year"?" they always seem to be on vacation.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Dr. Mike on 10/03/2010 10:43:16
avatar
"overentertained" OR underserved! Students are looking for relevance in their education. There are schools (70+ free and reduced lunch) that allow students to bring their own laptop/netbook and register on the wireless network at school. They allow students to text between classes and other times when they are not in direct control of an adult. Then the student goes into a classromm with no interaction at all. They open a book and do a worksheet; instead of teacher facilitated use of the SMART board and streaming video to help bring the classroom to life.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Doug on 10/03/2010 16:57:56
avatar
The solution is not technology. The solution is the mitigation and eventual elimination of poverty. America has one of the highest rates of relative poverty. It is relative poverty that matters not absolute poverty. The solutions? Medicare for all, higher minimum wage, housing for all, higher levels of teacher training zero tolerance for uncertified teachers, smaller classes and so on. Cost a lot of money? Sure but it cost a lot more not to do it.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
-1
Thalia on 10/03/2010 20:13:03
avatar
Teachers are the key. There are a few good ones out there. I taught public high school for two years. It wasn't the kids that were the problem. 85% of the teaching staff wasn't smart enough to be there. The best and brightest are the only ones qualified to teach ANY subject to children. Right now public school teachers are college grads who weren't good enough for industry. The system needs to be so that industry gets grads who weren't good enough to teach. The kids knew their teachers weren't qualified and therefore didn't try. I left because the system wasn't getting anywhere with what it had. Even the kids deemed "lost causes" tried for the good teachers. All the good teachers out there need to stand up for their profession and raise the standards of who we hire with our tax dollars.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Concerned Teacher on 10/03/2010 21:45:39
avatar
There are some good and bright folks in teaching. Some people enter teaching because they are not interested in the "rat race," and it is a temperament issue. Sometimes they are very bright and could have done otherwise. Turning education into the "rat race" to capture the "best and brightest" will require "rat race" sized compensation packages. Not happening.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
NellBa on 10/03/2010 23:28:45
avatar
This article contains some out and out falsehoods such as this:
"America’s education advantage, unrivaled in the years after World War
II ..." All during the 1950s and beyond we were told that the USSR had the best shools in the world. American schools were awful. Think of the best seller "Why Johnnie Cant Read". American schools we were told over and over with shrieks of delight were
pathetic. Go back and read the torrent of articles and speeches after Sputnik on how the USA was losing the Space Race because of our schools. Check Admiral Hyman Rickover's tirade on the subject. In reality what took place in high schools had nothing whatever to do with it. The outcome of the Cold War was determined by events in
real life not within schools.

Similarly, Ford, GM, etc did not lose market share because they could
not find engineers, or accountants or that their assembly workers did not
know algebra. They collapsed because in the post war era people from
our best schools got control over those companies from the real car
people, and set them on the road to ruin thru stupid policies. ("We
aren't in business to make cars, we're in business tio make money",
"There are no bad cars, just bad salesmen.")
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
Casey Eldridge on 11/03/2010 17:10:38
avatar
If you send more money out of country, than you spend on education, this is the result. Other countries eventually will catch up to your education system through the application of those funds to their own systems. We (the USA) need to spend some of these tax dollars on our own education system to get more scientists & engineers to stay at home & work for technology to make better airplanes, computers & computer applications. Maybe we can get more teenagers interested in making computer games & applications that they won't spend their time hacking systems we develop or make the money overseas.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
total: 7 | displaying: 1 - 7

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:



  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Navigate archive
first first September, 2010 first first
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30

CampusExplorer.com
Search for colleges

Review and compare the best trade schools in your area.

earn my degree

Job Board