Home | EdNewsToday | Parents rage at Albany over charter-busting bill

Add to:    Add to your del.icio.us del.icio.us   Digg this story Digg

Parents rage at Albany over charter-busting bill

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image

1.19.10 - Angry parents yesterday ripped Albany for putting the teachers union before kids, as lawmakers moved to block the expansion of charter schools -- jeopardizing New York state's bid to win $700 million in federal education funds.

Parents rage at Albany over charter-busting bill

New York Post

Angry parents yesterday ripped Albany for putting the teachers union before kids, as lawmakers moved to block the expansion of charter schools -- jeopardizing New York state's bid to win $700 million in federal education funds.

"They know better. My son be damned!" fumed Dan Clark, whose son, Dan Jr., is an eighth-grader at Democracy Prep Charter in Harlem.

"What this fight is really about is power and money," Clark said. "The legislators are afraid of the unions."

The deadline is today for the state to apply for the federal "Race to the Top" cash -- and lawmakers still had not reached an agreement on how to revamp the charter law to put New York in the best possible position to nab the funds. Talks at the Capitol were expected to continue today, with the application deadline looming at 4:30 p.m.

Parents, many of them minorities fed up with lousy schools, said lawmakers should be ashamed of themselves

"It's a travesty. We know that charter schools give the best education possible and put families first," said Washington Heights mom Alexcia Daniels, whose daughter, Aaliyah, 8, attends Hyde Leadership charter school in Hunts Point, The Bronx.

"What those Albany people are trying to do is say, 'We won't service the people who need services.' I really think they're doing a disservice to our children."

Shawn Kaba said her daughters -- Aissah, 12, and Kadijah, 9 -- are on charter waiting lists.

"We don't need those Albany lawmakers if they're not helping us. They're not treating us fairly. They're not giving us an equal opportunity," said Kaba, 43, a Monroe College librarian.

Cynthia Eytina, who lives in Harlem with sons Skye, 8, and Taj, 6, who both attend a traditional public school, said, "It's very stressful that legislators would put more restraints on the system when it's already tough to get into a charter school."

Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver (D-Manhattan) and Senate Democratic Conference leader John Sampson (Brooklyn) proposed legislation that would theoretically double the charter cap to 400.

But in practice, the bill would actually try to restrict charters by making the union-friendly Board of Regents -- appointed by the Legislature -- the main authorizer of new charters.

That amendment would restrict the role of the more charter-friendly State University of New York and take away city Schools Chancellor Joel Klein's power to propose new schools, charter supporters say.

The measure would also give public schools veto power in allowing charters to share their buildings, and add other onerous building requirements, charter advocates charge.

Both Gov. Paterson and Mayor Bloomberg said those provisions imperil the state's chances of being awarded up to $700 million in Race to the Top funds offered by President Obama.

In a fiery speech commemorating Martin Luther King Jr. Day at City Hall, Bloomberg said the Albany charter-school plan amounts to an "insult" to the civil-rights leader's legacy.

"Parents have every right to be furious," the mayor said. "Dr. King told us that a right delayed is a right denied, and this bill would continue to deny those children the quality school options that they deserve."

Paterson has his own proposal to boost the number of charters to 460, without restrictions.

Submitting a proposal that restricts charters "would be like shooting ourselves in the foot," Paterson said yesterday.

Last night, as he scolded lawmakers after they failed to act, Paterson pointedly refused to rule out signing the Silver-Sampson bill should it pass.

"I haven't made a final decision about that," Paterson said, adding later,

Additional reporting by David Seifman and Reuven Fenton

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (1 posted):

Paul Schickler on 19/01/2010 13:20:34
avatar
I read the above article and kept looking back to the top of the page, where I felt I must have missed the notation that this is an opinion piece. How is this article slanted? Let me count the ways:

1) The headline speaks of parents "raging" at a "charter-busting bill," not "parents claim," or "bill described as charter-busting."

2) The first line says the "lawmakers moved to block the expansion of charter schools." Well, that would be Bloomberg and Klein's side of the story. The other side of the story, lacking here, is the legislators' and the unions' statement that the idea is not to block new charters, but to have them operate under the same standards as non-charters, such as accepting fair numbers of special ed students and English language learners, and submitting to state audits. In an objective story, both sides would have been reported.

3) Here's the type of sentence that should never appear in a hard news story: "But in practice, the bill would actually try to restrict charters by making the union-friendly Board of Regents -- appointed by the Legislature -- the main authorizer of new charters." Is it possible that the Board of Regents would do a more objective and professional job of approving new charters? Is it possible that just as many new charters would be approved, though perhaps with needed checks on their operation? Is it possible that Education Week could have printed the other side of the story?

3) You have quotes, and many of them, only from proponents of the governor's bill. Not a single parent against the governor's version is quoted, nor a single legislator from either the Assembly or Senate, nor any member or officer of the unions which are blamed along with the legislators for standing in the way of the state getting millions of dollars. Which leads to my last point...

4) There is an unstated assumption that this Race to the Top money dangled in front of everyone's face, with strings attached, is a good idea, that the prioriites set by the federal government are advisable and beneficial to the students, and that any legislation that helps garner that money is good and outweighs the surrendering of the independence and good judgment of local educators. This assumption remains unexamined.

If this article is not an example of bias, then it is certainly a textbook example of journalistic incompetence.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
total: 1 | displaying: 1 - 1

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:



  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Navigate archive
first first September, 2010 first first
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30

CampusExplorer.com
Search for colleges

Review and compare the best trade schools in your area.

earn my degree

Job Board