Colorado Voucher Ruling Causes Confusion, Uncertainty
Douglas County school district officials are still sorting through the implications of a judge’s order on Friday that put a halt to their voucher pilot.
There’s confusion in Douglas County, Colorado now that a judge has ordered an injunction halting the Choice Scholarship Program. Parents and civil liberties groups who filed a lawsuit to stop the pilot sought only a preliminary injunction, which would have suspended the pilot while the legal challenges were resolved, writes Nancy Mitchell at Education News Colorado. But Denver District Judge Michael Martinez not only granted the preliminary injunction, but also went even further, declaring the evidence presented in a three-day hearing warranted the injunction stopping the Choice Scholarship Program be made permanent.
The legal argument is over unless the district decides to appeal — at least that’s how the 68-page ruling is being interpreted.
District spokesman Randy Barber said district officials “were a bit surprised that he went to a permanent injunction” though “we knew it was going to end up in the appeals court eventually.”
Douglass County school board members are reviewing their legal options, including whether to work through the state court of appeals or to go straight to the state’s highest court and ask to be heard. They could announce a decision at their first meeting of the new school year, tonight at Mesa Ridge Middle School. If not, Barber said district leaders hope to make their decision by week’s end.
Figuring out what to do about the 500 voucher students, including the 304 already accepted into private schools, as well as the $300,000 that have gone out in voucher payments, may take longer.
Karen Auge at community resource blog milehighmamas.com said that the judge’s ruling brought ‘confusion, stress and distress for parents, students and administrators”.
In his ruling, Martinez said he was returning the district to the status quo, which he defined as “the absence of the scholarship program.”
But he also noted the plaintiffs “have expressly not asked the court to direct the disenrollment of scholarship recipients already attending private partner schools or the return of funds already expended.”
The district’s contract with its private school partners says any voucher payments to the schools are pro-rated, meaning they keep the money only for the period of time a voucher student actually attended. The schools have to repay any remaining balance within 45 days of a student’s decision to leave.
Alex Luchenister, senior litigation counsel for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, one of the plaintiffs and a frequent party to voucher legal battles across the country, said:
“I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a decision that found a program violates as many constitutional provisions as this program does.”
Attorneys for the district and the state repeatedly urged the judge to consider a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court ruling which upheld a Cleveland voucher program that includes religious and non-religious schools.
Martinez, however, said disregarding the more specific religion provisions of the Colorado Constitution would be akin to saying the state’s founders “must have debated, drafted and ratified these provisions without purpose.”
In Indiana, where a similar case was being heard, a judge ruled that the “new statutory provisions guaranteeing publicly funded choice of even parochial schools are ‘religion-neutral’ and ‘for the benefit of students, not churches.’” writes Adam Emerson at redefinededonline.org.
A poll of 500 likely Douglas County voters conducted in April, weeks after the March 15 vote approving the voucher pilot, showed a divided community.
Asked whether they favored or opposed the “private school scholarship program,” 49 percent said they strongly favored or favored the program while 47 percent said they strongly opposed or opposed the program.
Enter your email to subscribe to daily Education News!
- Education Technology
- Online Education
- California Education
- Charter Schools
- Teachers Unions
- Education Research
- New York Education
- School Choice
- Education Funding
- STEM Education
- UK Education
- Parent Involvement
- Cost of College
- New York City Schools
- Common Core
- Florida Education
- Julia Steiny
- Texas Education
- School Health
- Math Education
- Los Angeles Schools
- Education Reform
- Pennsylvania Education
- Obama Administration
- Louisiana Education
- Chicago Schools
- College Admissions
- Online Courses
- New Jersey Education
- Teacher Training
- Ohio Education
- C. M. Rubin
- Tennessee Education
- Health Education
- Early Childhood Education
- UK Higher Education
- Massachusetts Education
- Illinois Education
- 2012 Election
- Teacher Evaluation
- Michigan Education
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
- Select a City Subject
- Web Design Schools in Aptos
- Web Design Schools in Berkeley
- Web Design Schools in Chula Vista
- Web Design Schools in Costa Mesa
- Web Design Schools in Cypress
- Web Design Schools in Fountain Valley
- Web Design Schools in Fremont
- Web Design Schools in Irvine
- Web Design Schools in Lathrop
- Web Design Schools in Livermore
- Web Design Schools in Long Beach
- Web Design Schools in Mission Viejo
- Web Design Schools in Monterey Park
- Web Design Schools in North Hollywood
- Web Design Schools in Reedley
- Web Design Schools in Ridgecrest
- Web Design Schools in Riverside
- Web Design Schools in Sacramento
- Web Design Schools in Salinas
- Web Design Schools in San Diego
- Web Design Schools in San Dimas
- Web Design Schools in San Francisco
- Web Design Schools in San Jacinto
- Web Design Schools in San Jose
- Web Design Schools in San Luis Obispo
- Web Design Schools in San Marcos
- Web Design Schools in San Mateo
- Web Design Schools in Santa Clara
- Web Design Schools in Santa Monica
- Web Design Schools in Santa Rosa
- Web Design Schools in Saratoga
- Web Design Schools in Sonora
- Web Design Schools in Sylmar
- Web Design Schools in Torrance
- Web Design Schools in Walnut