Distributing leadership to support instructional change

2.1.10 – Discussions of comprehensive school reform and distributed leadership have been dominated by descriptions of what they are and what forms they take. Now a plausible case can be made that distributing leadership to teachers can support instructional change, says UW–Madison education professor Eric Camburn.

Distributing leadership to support instructional change

Discussions of comprehensive school reform and distributed leadership have been dominated by descriptions of what they are and what forms they take. Now a plausible case can be made that distributing leadership to teachers can support instructional change, says UW–Madison education professor Eric Camburn.

In a 2008 study, Camburn determined that configuring and activating teacher leadership positions can support the adoption of specific instructional practices advocated by the America’s Choice program.

The America’s Choice program distributes leadership responsibilities to teacher leaders in schools. How this comprehensive school reform program played out in a sample of urban elementary schools was Camburn’s question.

America’s Choice calls for two teacher leader roles—design coach and literacy coordinator. Design coaches provide broad support for implementing the America’s Choice program. The literacy coordinators specifically help teachers implement the early grades literacy curriculum.

Camburn’s study measured the extent to which these teacher leaders served as resources for adopting new teaching practices. He also measured changes in instructional practice, including the use of ability grouping, individualized instruction, and think-alouds.

Because Camburn wanted to determine how these factors compared over time, he examined 31 schools early in their adoption of America’s Choice and again 2 years later.

Teacher leaders as resources African American teachers spent significantly more time working with teacher leaders than teachers of other races in both school years sampled. Teachers with fewer years of experience spent more time working with teacher leaders in the 2001–2002 school year, but the estimate for teacher experience was not statistically significant during the 2003–2004 school year. Teachers with less content knowledge for teaching literacy also spent more time working with teacher leaders. Camburn says these latter two results may indicate a rational allocation of leadership resources in schools: Less experienced and less knowledgeable teachers receive greater attention from teacher leaders. continue…

Leave a comment

Monday

February 1st, 2010

Jimmy Kilpatrick

Subscribe

Enter your email to subscribe to daily Education News!

Hot Topics

Career Index

Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.

View All