Creativity in the Classroom
2.14.10 – Dave Gray – Futurist Alvin Toffler once said that mass education has both an overt and a covert curriculum. The overt curriculum was “reading, writing and arithmetic,
Creativity in the Classroom
Futurist Alvin Toffler once said that mass education has both an overt and a covert curriculum. The overt curriculum was “reading, writing and arithmetic, a bit of history and other subjects.”1 But beneath it, he said, lay an invisible or “covert curriculum” which consisted of three courses: one in punctuality, one in obedience and one in rote, repetitive work.
This makes sense when you look at the history of U.S. education. The public school system was introduced during the industrial revolution, which spanned from about 1840-1920. In 1840, most of the population (about 90 percent) lived in rural communities, and by 1920, the urban/rural split was about 50/50, as workers migrated to cities to work in factories.
The industrial revolution radically changed the way we turned raw materials into products. It changed the way goods were collected, processed, exchanged, distributed and ultimately controlled. This changed not only how we organized our work but how we organized society.
The factory teaching model that Toffler describes was successful throughout most of the 20th century. It is so deeply embedded in our educational system that it’s sometimes hard to see. We don’t notice it because it’s how we learned when we were in school – it’s how we were trained to be the people we are today.
But today’s world brings new challenges, for which many of us find ourselves unprepared. New technologies with massive processing power are connecting more people to more information than was previously conceivable. The amount of new information in the world doubles every two years. It’s predicted that by 2015 it will double every week.
Like the industrial revolution, this new information revolution is shifting the way we collect, process, exchange, distribute and control a key asset – information. This new economy requires a new kind of worker, with different skills, methods and approaches.
It also requires a rethinking of our educational system. What should a new, revised curriculum look like? For clues, let’s examine the fundamental differences between industrial work and knowledge work.
How do we prepare students for a world that’s undergoing such radical change, a world where none of us have ever been and many of us still don’t understand? We need a system that looks at teaching differently; that rewards breadth of vision and creativity and recognizes a diversity of viewpoints.
We can’t teach facts anymore. Facts change too fast. The U.S. Department of Labor estimates that today’s students will have 10 to 14 jobs by their 38th birthday.
I am now 45. I learned science in school, including a lot of facts, but I never “did” any science. Every lab experiment I ever did had predetermined results; the answers were known in advance. But science is about search, about asking questions, about discovery and understanding the world in new ways. The way to learn science is to understand the method and apply it to something NEW. Otherwise, it’s just like that rote factory worker who is simply repeating someone else’s “repeatable result.”
Our current teaching method is based on the idea that we can teach students to solve problems. It presupposes that we can define the problems in advance, which in turn presupposes that we know the answers. We give the problems to our students and grade them based on the correctness of the answer. But while creativity may help in problem-solving, it’s a fundamentally different activity.
The difference is this: Problem-solving is a repair activity. Inherent in the concept of a problem is the removal of an obstacle or difficulty.
Creativity is not about fixing things that are broken but about bringing new things into being.
Take the example of a broken car. “Fixing the problem” will get you to a working car. It will never get you to a fundamentally different kind of transportation, such as, for example, an airplane, boat or motorcycle.
Problem-solving asks the question “What is wrong?” or “What is broken?” It assumes there is a right answer, and it’s in the teacher’s edition of the textbook. But creativity asks the question “What do you want?” or “What is possible?” It presumes that there are not one but an infinite field of possible solutions.
There are some teaching methods that have demonstrated success in this area.
The Montessori method, developed in the early 1900s by Maria Montessori, emphasizes self-directed learning, adaptiveness and discovery. It also boasts an impressive array of information-economy innovators among its alumni: Larry Page and Sergey Brin, co-founders of Google, were trained in the Montessori method, as were Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon.com, Jimmy Wales, the founder of Wikipedia, and Will Wright, who invented the best-selling video game of all time, The Sims.
Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) is a more recent approach, developed by Abigail Housen and Philip Yenawine in the 1980s, which uses visualization to increase students’ critical thinking, communication and visual literacy skills. It has been shown to increase reading and math scores from 6 to 20 percent. And it works for adults, too: A study conducted by the Harvard Medical School demonstrated that medical students, who studied using the VTS method, were 38 percent more accurate in diagnosing unknown conditions than their peers.
Both Montessori and VTS focus on creative and critical thinking skills, collaboration, social skills and both embrace the search for multiple solutions to complex problems.
I believe VTS is on the right track with its focus on visual thinking. Visual thinking maps closely to the key strategies of the information economy:
1.Generalization. Drawing and other forms of visualization are used in some way in every field, from architecture to medicine to product design.
2.Humanization. Sketching taps into the imagination and intuition. It can be very effective for exploring ideas that are not fully understood.
3.Decentralization. The more ways that we can find to represent information, the more diverse the set of perspectives we can gain. Information that’s visual adds an extra dimension to information that’s represented with words or numbers.
Visualization can be used to explore things we don’t fully understand yet – it’s the first stage of bringing new ideas into the world. Leonardo da Vinci’s bicycle is a perfect example.
In one of da Vinci’s notebooks2, you will find a rough sketch that is clearly a bicycle.
The history of the bicycle is a bit fuzzy, but historians generally agree that the modern bicycle was invented in the 1860s in France.3 So when da Vinci was sketching this futuristic idea, the very words that we use to describe the modern bike – not only the word bicycle but pedals, brakes, crank drive, etc. – did not exist. So in effect, the only way to describe such a futuristic concept was in words borrowed from other sources or, more successfully, by visualization.
Transforming education is not a simple or easy task, and the answers to the difficult challenges we face are far from clear. But some pioneers are already out there leading the charge, and if the U.S. is to remain globally competitive, change is not an option, it’s an imperative.
Dave Gray is the founder and CEO of XPLANE, the visual thinking company. Founded in 1993, XPLANE is now the world’s leading information-driven consulting and design firm, with clients in various industries around the world.
1.Alvin Toffler, The Third Wave.
2.Leonardo da Vinci, Codex Atlanticus.
3.Most authorities credit Pierre and Ernest Michaux, a French father-and-son team of carriage-makers, with the invention of the bicycle.
INDUSTRIAL WORK VS. INFORMATION WORK
Industrial work aims to transform raw materials into products which improve our lives. Its focus is on things – making stuff – and its primary method is efficiency of production. To be successful, industrial work requires the following:
1.Specialization. Divide work into tasks, so each task can be learned more easily and done more efficiently by a lower-skilled worker.
2.Mechanization. Breaking down work into tasks makes each task simpler, making it easier to design machines to automate the specialized function.
3.Centralization. Specialized tasks can only increase efficiency if they are coordinated across the workflow. This requires centralized control.
As a result of these approaches, work becomes centered on the machine. Without highly-skilled work, pride in craft is lost. Eventually, more and more tasks become automated, and the workforce becomes not only disillusioned but obsolete.
Information work transforms raw data into information which improves our lives. Its focus is not on things but what they mean. In peace and in war, in work and in life, better information leads to more opportunities, better decisions and better results. The primary method of information work is not efficiency of production, but rather, proficiency of induction – the ability to find patterns and imagine possibilities. A valuable information worker is one who can find or create meaning that was previously unseen. Successful information work requires the following:
1.Generalization. Finding opportunities comes from examining information from across a wide range of sources and disciplines.
2.Humanization. Opportunities, by their nature, involve seeing the world in new ways and making connections that we didn’t think of before. This requires human imagination, creativity and intuition.
3.Decentralization. Cross-disciplinary, creative work gains strength from greater diversity and more points of view. To manage this kind of activity requires collaboration rather than control.
But someone who is trained by our system to be a good industrial worker will only be confused and disoriented by an information-oriented workplace.
Enter your email to subscribe to daily Education News!
- Education Technology
- Online Education
- California Education
- Charter Schools
- Teachers Unions
- Education Research
- New York Education
- School Choice
- Education Funding
- STEM Education
- Parent Involvement
- UK Education
- Cost of College
- New York City Schools
- Florida Education
- Julia Steiny
- Common Core
- Texas Education
- Math Education
- School Health
- Los Angeles Schools
- Obama Administration
- Education Reform
- Pennsylvania Education
- Louisiana Education
- Chicago Schools
- College Admissions
- Teacher Training
- Online Courses
- New Jersey Education
- C. M. Rubin
- Ohio Education
- Early Childhood Education
- UK Higher Education
- Health Education
- Illinois Education
- Tennessee Education
- 2012 Election
- iPads in the Classroom
- Massachusetts Education
- Teacher Evaluation
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
- Select a State Subject
- Architecture Schools in Michigan
- Design Schools in Ohio
- Human Resources Schools in Nebraska
- Select a City Subject
- Architecture Schools in Adrian
- Architecture Schools in Ann Arbor
- Architecture Schools in Berrien Springs
- Architecture Schools in Big Rapids
- Architecture Schools in Bloomfield Hills
- Architecture Schools in Dearborn
- Architecture Schools in Detroit
- Architecture Schools in East Lansing
- Architecture Schools in Flint
- Architecture Schools in Grand Rapids
- Architecture Schools in Ironwood
- Architecture Schools in Lansing
- Architecture Schools in Marquette
- Architecture Schools in Mount Pleasant
- Architecture Schools in Port Huron
- Architecture Schools in Southfield
- Architecture Schools in University Center
- Architecture Schools in Ypsilanti
- Design Schools in Sandusky
- Human Resources Schools in Bellevue
- Human Resources Schools in Chadron
- Human Resources Schools in Hastings
- Human Resources Schools in Lincoln
- Human Resources Schools in Omaha
- Human Resources Schools in York