Home | EdReports | Just Stop Teaching Reading

Add to:    Add to your del.icio.us del.icio.us   Digg this story Digg

Just Stop Teaching Reading

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
" />

12.29.09 - Linda Schrock Taylor - Hear ye, hear ye! The 2009 award for the most Stupid Educational Fad goes to… all schools where spelling is no longer being taught; with special “Fickle Finger of Failure” prizes to administrators

Just Stop Teaching Reading

Written by Linda Schrock Taylor 12.29.09

Hear ye, hear ye!  The 2009 award for the most Stupid Educational Fad goes to… all schools where spelling is no longer being taught; with special “Fickle Finger of Failure” prizes to administrators, school boards, state school boards, departments of education, and all others who believe that teachers should officially “stop teaching spelling”… as if trashing of the last vestige of actual academic instruction in America should be celebrated.   

I suggest that in the last 50 years, American public schools have not taught enough spelling to even make a “stoppage” worthy of media coverage. Instead of making announcements, these criminals should sign confessions down at their local police departments. Frankly, schools have long been attempting to hide their educational crimes of omission, and of teacher inefficiency, by forcing students to memorize lists of spelling words for Friday tests.

The schools should put an end to the counterproductive foolishness that passes for “reading instruction” and use their time instead to only teach spelling. My mother (who taught school until she was 72 years old) is accurate when she states that “those children, who do learn to read in today’s schools, learn in spite of the instruction.” Nothing else accounts for the few children who escape, actually literate, from the ever-deepening rot that has taken over academics in this nation.  Massachusetts had a literacy rate of 98 percent until … they opened public schools. Their literacy rates have been in freefall since then, and the other 49 states blindly leaped for the band wagon … but to their academic deaths, as well.

Teacher-training (LOL) professors; school administrators; local school boards; state school boards; state and federal Departments of Education, I need your attention. The language of America — English, for those who have forgotten — is written in a CODE and the only way to learn how to read and write anything written in that CODE is to first learn how to SPELL. Musical performers and creators learn to read and write the Code in which music is written. Dancers and choreographers learn to read and write the Code in which movement can be recorded. Stenographers used to learn to read and write shorthand notation which also is a Code. When schools lost the teachers who understood the importance of, and how to teach spelling — real education came to a standstill. Schools no longer are capable of teaching students how to Encode, or how to Decode, the Code In Which English is Recorded

A moment, please, to defend young teachers because they have lost out twice — once in the K-12 schools of their youth, and again with the nothingness that they learned in teacher-training programs. They paid tuition to be trained as effective teachers. (Can anyone imagine an accountant who cannot account receiving a college degree?) Unfortunately, college professors are usually so busy theorizing or developing new fads to foist upon the mis-education culture, that they have little to teach; and almost no focus from which to teach. Furthermore, they have little-to-no-effective teaching experience of their own because, frankly, teachers learn more in the first three to five years of teaching than they get taught to their students. To “train” future teachers, one only is expected to have a research PhD and 3-4 years of teaching. (Remember, those first teaching years are only partially effective.)

For teachers who have taught more than five ineffective years but still carry on as usual; refusing to acknowledge and learn missing skills; ignoring blatant failure and suffering students — shame on you. There are libraries. There is the Internet. There is
Spalding International. There are my articles. There is no excuse for stubbornness and laziness. Such teachers spend their days NOT teaching children to read, spell, and learn, but happily collect unearned paychecks and ask for raises. They are destroying lives with each day of fraudulent instruction. 

Our jails and prisons are filled with 1st-3rd grade readers. Our welfare rolls are filled with the same. How can we expect adults to be fully self-sufficient and lead families with wisdom, in a technical culture, if our schools cannot and will not teach them to read, write, spell, and learn knowledge? If America’s educational mess is not cleaned up ASAP, there will be no future for our nation; for our people; for our Rights and Freedoms. We must start changing local policies today. My mission is to teach Michigan to read; to again retake the leadership position that it held back when I was in school in the Sixties; back when Michigan and California led the nation. Please join me.

Learn to teach systematic, methodical encoding of the English language. The term for that is “Spelling.” If schools must drop anything, they should drop reading lessons in order to more perfectly teach spelling lessons.  Buy The Writing Road to Reading by Romalda Spalding. Order a set of the Spalding phono/gram (Greek for sound/write) cards.  Learn how to carefully teach students of all ages to Encode (put into code = Spell) and Decode (take from code = Read) English. Use precise pronunciation and expect the same from your students of all ages. 

Why are Hispanic and black children failing to learn to read and spell? They lack precision with their pronunciation of English! There is too much of a breakdown — a disconnect — when a child says “baf roo” while trying to write or read the word “bathroom.” We do children great harm when we accept dialects and slang as a substitute for Standard English. The Code for English is based upon Standard English. I explain to my students that in my home we call whipped cream, “creama-whippa” because that was how my very deaf brother pronounced the name for that product. However … never do we go to the grocery store and ask for Creama-Whippa! Never do we expect the people of America to accept our mis-speak as real English. Dialect is fine for use within family circles and subcultures but when teachers, parents, and the nation allow dialect and slang to take the place of properly-spoken English, educational failure is the Expected Outcome! Politically Correct has turned schools into crime-filled places. PC > CP — Crimes against Pupils, Parents, Public.

Toss out textbooks that fail to teach children to read, spell, write. Replace them with the $5.40 readers from Spalding. Think about this: of all businesses, only textbook publishers get rich by selling products that fail. Why does America tolerate such an anti-economically-sensible and educationally-destructive situation? Textbook sales representative to school official: “We know that our 103rd edition failed to teach your students to read, but if your district will only buy our new, bigger, more expensive, flashier 104th edition, your students might learn to read this time. Oh, btw, we sell failing fuzzy math books, also. Crashing math scores, anyone?” 

Demand that your districts invest in products that work, like those from non-profit
Spalding International. Demand that your districts hire Spalding trainers to do what the colleges failed to accomplish — train teachers to effectively instruct. I promise, teachers will learn more in two weeks of Spalding training than they would learn in years spent at most of today’s university teacher-training programs.

School decision makers — if you are unwilling to follow my advice to teach spelling, and then just stop teaching reading, also. You are wasting everyone’s time and money while you turn America into a mass of illiterates. Instead, direct your teachers to spend every day reading aloud to the classes. Students can use their auditory skills and so learn a wealth of vocabulary, concepts, and facts in order to develop a wide general knowledge base. For fulltime oral reading of increasingly more challenging texts, the public would finally gain from the money spent on teachers’ salaries. Students would exit school as educated individuals; as complete, whole human beings. America owes our children at least that much.


Linda Schrock Taylor
, M.A., taught special education for 35 years in public schools. Now retired from teaching, she is finishing her book for reclaiming lives, “Rapid Reading Remediation;” and is running for Governor of Michigan on a platform for A Constitutional & Literate Michigan.  (U.S. Taxpayers Party of Michigan, a branch of The Constitution Party)  Michigan residents who are interested in being trained to teach reading as volunteers in Linda’s “Literacy for Michigan” campaign can contact her at readinglessons@hotmail.com.

Subscribe to comments feed Comments (14 posted):

David on 29/12/2009 21:00:43
avatar
I hear you. As a high school history teacher with a B.A. and M.A. in history, not education, I have been astounded at the vacuous crap that has come out of the eductaion establishment over the last 15 years. I believe that the educrat mentality in regards to students is wrong-headed at its core: Educrats believe that students are all naturally curious and that we, as teachers, must just create the right, engaging environment for them to discover on their own. I say no! Most students are reluctant learners in the academic sense. Teacher-centered, direct instruction, no cell-phones, no technology, just old-fashioned learning is what we need. But I guess I must be crazy for thinking this!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
9
Marilyn on 30/12/2009 09:37:26
avatar
Thank you Linda!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
3
Concerned parent on 30/12/2009 10:19:17
avatar
Bravo, Linda!

Your protests will continue to fall on deaf ears by the educRAT$. The purpose of public education in the U.S. is not to teach students how to read, write, and do math but to control behavior and the "change students' fixed beliefs" - see Bloom's taxonomy. The past 40 to 50 years has seen citizens in the role of the proverbial frog. The water has been gradually heating up, and now a thin minority is waking up to the reality that we have been "had" by the educational establishment. This deliberate dumbing down of America began about a hundred years and you will not find this history in our public school textbooks. Thank goodness for the internet, which can be a tool for both good and evil.

Charlotte Iserbyt tells it like it is in her free online book:

http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/

And John Taylor Gatto's online history book can be also read free online:
http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/underground/index.htm

Also check out the Fourth Purpose of public education.

Public schools are in the business of making sure as many students as possible DO NOT learn to read. These will make up the proletariat in the near future.

Today most young children who learn to read in K-2 learn at home, taught by their parents in afterschooling. I taught all of my children to read at home, wondering why they were not learning how to read at school. I soon learned, through research, what was happening in our schools. Very few schools are teaching kids to read through phonics instruction - this against NCLB. Why have an alphabet at all, if you are not going to teach the code?

Excellent article, Linda! Keep it up!

Many will learn to get it! Many also need to know that the politics of education created the fertile ground for corruption, waste and fraud carried on by the educRAT$ in power, who care only about $$ and power, not about kids or education. Parents need to pull their kids out of this dysfunctional system, and do whatever it takes to homeschool!

www.whitechalkcrime.com
www.thecartelmovie.com
www.endteacherabuse.org
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
6
Gerry C. Carter on 30/12/2009 13:33:21
avatar
There are other reading programmes that recognise that written language is based on a code - the alphabetic code. Amongst the best are:
Direct Instruction
Abecedarian
3RsPlus: Beginning Reading Instruction

and there are a number of very effective 'synthetic phonics' programmes in the U.K.

But, yes, it is profoundly shocking - those of us who have been involved in teaching even the most cognitively challenged children to read can only feel deeply disturbed that our Colleges refuse to instruct their students on how to enable all children to read. Instead, they conjure up a dazzling multitude of health/cognitive/environmental problems and lay the blame on the kids rather than on their mal-instruction.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
2
Gerry C. Carter on 30/12/2009 13:33:48
avatar
There are other reading programmes that recognise that written language is based on a code - the alphabetic code. Amongst the best are:
Direct Instruction
Abecedarian
3RsPlus: Beginning Reading Instruction

and there are a number of very effective 'synthetic phonics' programmes in the U.K.

But, yes, it is profoundly shocking - those of us who have been involved in teaching even the most cognitively challenged children to read can only feel deeply disturbed that our Colleges refuse to instruct their students on how to enable all children to read. Instead, they conjure up a dazzling multitude of health/cognitive/environmental problems and lay the blame on the kids rather than on their mal-instruction.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
3
Robin Hansen on 30/12/2009 14:18:42
avatar
Excellent article!!!
More people need to stand up to the educrats and speak up for the kids. Many administators are more interested in keeping their jobs than educating kids. It is so sad!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
2
Deborah Dessaso on 30/12/2009 21:10:04
avatar
Thanks for the article. One of the biggest jokes in higher education is "developmental" or "remedial" courses. Even the liberal-minded CUNY has dropped its developmental/remedial English courses, ostensibly because the students weren't learning anything. An article about remedial courses in a recent issue of Washington Monthly was aptly titled, "Higher Education's Bermuda Triangle." Students enroll in these programs and are never heard from again--and yet colleges continue to force students into the noncredit courses. As a friend of mine once said, "When you do what you've always done, you get what you've always got!" Colleges and universities get millions of student loan dollars "getting what they've always got," and taxpayers and students continue to pay the price!
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Jules on 31/12/2009 11:27:18
avatar
As is often the case, detractors do their utmost to link correlation with causation. Much has changed since MA had the 98% literacy rate you boast. I question, seriously question, whether the child laborers in the Irish, and other, tenements enjoyed a 98% literacy rate? Come on. Many, many things have changed since we had these "golden days" of alleged 98% literacy.

Regarding the low literacy rates among prison inmates, various factors contribute to person's descent into a life of petty crime. Literacy again is correlated, but likely only a single factor among a plethora of factors (some of which contribute more causitively to choosing petty crime over a life of upstanding good citizenship).

It is important to be honest in our assessment of our socio-cultural problems. True and lasting solutions will not become available until we do so.

As to readiness courses... When I entered college in 1960 most people did not go to college. 4-year colleges were selective, they were permitted to select only students they thought could succeed. There were fewer remedial programs because remedial students on the whole were not admitted. No one groused about students needing remediation in college.

Perhaps we should ask why and consider that this might involve more than merely the teaching methodology employed There is so much more than being able to accurately read and write words.

This has gradually changed with the growth of the community college system and the promise of universal college education our politicians have made. Today we have a population of youth entering this system who heretofore never attended college because they could not get admitted (a friend of mine never made the cut for a 4-year degree, she just couldn't meet the academic requirements for admission into a degree program. Today she would be taking remedial classes at community college and our media would be grousing that students such as she require remediation because our public schools are so abysmal.)

We have concerns, issues and challenges. Let's acknowledge that there is very little in life that is the result of a single cause. These are complex issues. No single method has been shown to teach reading significantly better than any other. We teach decoding in our reading programs today and good teachers understand that good teaching is balanced (you may not like that term), and that students must decode and comprehend words.

I have to insist that Ms. Taylor's essay was unbalanced and one sided. We don't achieve meaningful reform with this approach.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
Kay on 31/12/2009 12:24:07
avatar
How much did Spalding pay for the great advertisement? If only one method is the answer to success in reading and writing, then we must be raising a nation of Stepford children! Spalding has been around for a long while, as have many other programs. If a "program" makes the difference then we might as well get rid of every teacher and let the "program" do the job. Thank you Jules for your clear thinking.
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
0
concerned parent on 31/12/2009 13:57:53
avatar
Jules, your comments are the typical mantra of educRAT$. There is indeed one method of teaching reading that is better than others; this methodology is spelled out in NCLB, in both the definition of reading and its components of instruction, and has its basis in research studies that prove without a doubt that children learn to read via systemic and explicit phonics instruction. What do you think RTI (response to intervention - which very few school systems are yet doing) is all about?

Why are there more and more small children each year being given SLD labels? It is because of mal-instruction. They have not been taught to read, not that they cannot read. And their parents did not get the "memo" that they were supposed to teach their children at home in afterschooling. Very few school children have true SLDs; they have not been taught to read by teachers who know how to teach reading. More to the point, their administrators prohibit the teaching of reading. I know teachers who were practically fired for trying to teach their students to read via phonics, and with much success I might add.

The "balanced" literacy approach is simply a new name for the ineffective whole language approach that has never taught a single child how to read. This new term pure deception to get the public to fall for this newfangled "research-based" instruction that is nothing more than whole language with 5% of "incidental" phonics, only if the teacher feels like it or has time for it, which is usually not the case. My children's teacher last year could barely read herself, having admittedly been taught via whole language, and knew nothing about phonics, teaching the students that the "a" in "ball" is a short "a" sound. Ridiculous and pathetic! (The children who learn how to read via whole language are learning how to read IN SPITE of this failed approach; their parents are teaching them at home at night and on weekends via sounding out the words.)

While no one is saying that the failures of the school system are based on a single factor, we do believe that schools should at least start with reading instruction that actually works! If they are getting federal funds thru NCLB, they MUST teach phonics method. Why do they steal these federal funds and not implement NCLB's requirements? That is the first place to start with children in K-2. It's also the easiest way to fix many of the failings. Why the resistance? Unless the goal of government monopoly indoctrination centers called public "education" does not have a goal to teach children who to read, write, and do math, which is suspiciously becoming clearer to many day by day.

http://www.sopriswest.com/pdfs/whole_language_high_jinks.pdf
Thumbs Up Thumbs Down
1
1 2 next total: 14 | displaying: 1 - 10

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:



  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text
Tags
No tags for this article
Navigate archive
first first September, 2010 first first
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30

CampusExplorer.com
Search for colleges

Review and compare the best trade schools in your area.

earn my degree

Job Board