Liberty Starts in School
Bill Costello – American public schools are not producing students who can think. How can we expect to maintain our liberty when our citizens lack the ability to reach independent conclusions on issues of the day?
Students learn to think by hearing both sides of an issue, weighing the evidence, applying reason, and forming independent conclusions. However, American public schools are not presenting students with opposing views.
Instead, students are only hearing issues from the perspective of the political left.
It does not matter which perspective is correct. If students only heard issues from the perspective of the political right, they still would not be learning to think.
Students should be taught to gather relevant facts from both perspectives and then form their own opinions. After all, teachers will not always be around to tell them what to think. And some students may find they don’t always agree with their teachers.
Educational propaganda is not new. During World War II, it contributed to the loss of liberty in France.
During World War I, the French fought four long years to protect their liberty. They were patriots. After the war, however, they became pacifists when French primary schoolteachers promoted pacifism over patriotism in the classroom.
This moral disarmament prevented the French from stopping Hitler when his forces were still weaker than theirs. Hitler was able to build up his forces and invade France during World War II. This time the French did not fight four long years to protect their liberty. They surrendered in just six weeks.
In America, patriotism is not promoted in public schools. Instead, American values and principles are attacked. Students are hearing only one side of the story. They need to hear the good and the bad to get the real story and to learn to think.
While history classes could be contributing to social cohesion by teaching students about America’s achievements, they are instead contributing to social exclusion by focusing on blame, grievances, and victimhood—both real and imagined. Somehow it has become trendy to disparage America.
Producing an educated electorate requires a balanced presentation of history.
In order to teach history from an impartial perspective, teachers need to focus on facts—not feelings and rhetoric.
However, a new survey of high school social studies teachers by the American Enterprise Institute found that: “Teaching facts is the lowest priority for social studies teachers when it comes to instruction in citizenship. Of the five priorities high schools may have around the teaching of citizenship, only 20 percent of teachers put teaching key facts, dates, and major events at the top of their list. Furthermore, it is the last of twelve items rated by teachers as absolutely essential to teach high school students: only 36 percent say it is absolutely essential to teach students ‘to know facts (e.g., location of the fifty states) and dates (e.g., Pearl Harbor).’”
Part of the problem, according to journalist Tucker Carlson, is “the hard-edged propaganda that now suffuses history textbooks. A thorough cover-to-cover reading of almost any high school history text leaves you with the impression that the United States is at best embarrassing, and at worst a menace to world peace. The internment of Japanese-Americans during World War Two gets almost us much emphasis as the American liberation of Europe.”
History textbooks are rewriting history with a heavy emphasis on America’s shortcomings. This emphasis is not balanced with a discussion of the shortcomings of other nations and cultures—and they all have shortcomings.
Instead, these nations and cultures receive every benefit of doubt.
The Texas State Board of Education recently approved a resolution arguing that numerous history textbooks favor Islam and demonize Christianity.
Specifically, the resolution states that the board: “will look to reject future prejudicial social studies submissions that continue to offend Texas law with respect to treatment of the world’s major religious groups by significant inequalities of coverage spacewise and/or by demonizing or lionizing one or more of them over others.”
In these textbooks, Islam receives every benefit of doubt. Shortcomings are not mentioned. America and Christianity, however, are not afforded the same treatment.
Students are not hearing both sides and are not learning to think for themselves.
Part of the problem stems from the liberal indoctrination teachers themselves receive from professors in college, which then trickles down to their students. A study by political science professors Robert Lichter, Stanley Rothman, and Neil Nevitte found that 72 percent of American professors are liberal and 15 percent are conservative.
In that atmosphere, what are the chances that teachers are learning to think by hearing both sides of an issue, weighing the evidence, applying reason, and forming independent conclusions? If they themselves are not learning to think, how are they going to teach others?
Has American public education become a propaganda organ for the political left? If so, America’s future is bleak.
Without the ability to reach independent conclusions on issues of the day, generations of Americans will be ill-equipped to govern themselves and maintain their liberty.
———————————————————————–
Bill Costello, M.Ed., is the president of U.S.-based Making Minds Matter, LLC and the author of “Awaken Your Birdbrain: Using Creativity to Get What You Want.” He can be reached at www.makingmindsmatter.com.
Subscribe
Enter your email to subscribe to daily Education News!
Hot Topics
- Education Technology
- Teachers Unions
- Charter Schools
- California Education
- Education Research
- New York Education
- Online Education
- UK Education
- STEM Education
- School Choice
- Cost of College
- Education Funding
- New York City Schools
- Julia Steiny
- Florida Education
- Education Reform
- Parent Involvement
- Texas Education
- C. M. Rubin
- Math Education
- Los Angeles Schools
- Obama Administration
- Chicago Schools
- Testing
- Vouchers
- 2012 Election
- New Jersey Education
- Pennsylvania Education
- Tennessee Education
- Teaching
- UK Higher Education
- Teacher Training
- Early Childhood Education
- Louisiana Education
- College Admissions
- Ohio Education
- Teacher Evaluations
- School Health
- Illinois Education
- Literacy
- MOOCs
- Arne Duncan
- Cheating
- UK Politics
- Michigan Education
Career Index
Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.
- Select a City Subject
- Political Science Schools in Aptos
- Political Science Schools in Arcata
- Political Science Schools in Azusa
- Political Science Schools in Bakersfield
- Political Science Schools in Berkeley
- Political Science Schools in Camarillo
- Political Science Schools in Claremont
- Political Science Schools in Culver City
- Political Science Schools in Davis
- Political Science Schools in El Cajon
- Political Science Schools in Fullerton
- Political Science Schools in Huntington Beach
- Political Science Schools in La Verne
- Political Science Schools in Long Beach
- Political Science Schools in Los Angeles
- Political Science Schools in Malibu
- Political Science Schools in Mission Viejo
- Political Science Schools in Monterey
- Political Science Schools in Northridge
- Political Science Schools in Oakland
- Political Science Schools in Pomona
- Political Science Schools in Redlands
- Political Science Schools in Redwood City
- Political Science Schools in Riverside
- Political Science Schools in Sacramento
- Political Science Schools in San Bernardino
- Political Science Schools in San Francisco
- Political Science Schools in San Luis Obispo
- Political Science Schools in San Rafael
- Political Science Schools in Santa Rosa
- Political Science Schools in Stanford
- Political Science Schools in Stockton
- Political Science Schools in Torrance
- Political Science Schools in Weed
- Political Science Schools in Yucaipa


Comments
Sometimes the 2 sides of the issue are the correct side and the wrong side. Schools teach global warming, gay rights, war is evil, rich people are greedy,black people are equal, immigration is good for America, not because they are left wing but only because these things are beyond debate now like the Flat Earth and Evolution. They are just facts.
The article claims that students should be presented with "both sides" and then be allowed to decide for themselves. But I don't think that that is how history is (or should be) taught.
In order to learn history and critical thinking, students need to learn timelines, facts, issues, and the questions upon which historians focus. They need to learn how to critique history. That is why history presents a "critical view" rather than just a "patriotic" or self-congratulatory one as some like Tucker Carlson and the Texas Board of Education seem to prefer.
What the author is proposing, is another version of moral relativism.
Kids not knowing right vs wrong. Look at both sides and then figure it out without good guidance.
NO, this is why we chose a parochial school. They learn right vs wrong. Then when they are taught the facts they are able to analyze the situation properly.
Anyone with children knows they are not equipped to make these decisions. Not to mention, when two sides of an issue is presented, it's not like they've done scholarly research.
Form the conscience FIRST. Feed them information and facts. They'll be far more capable of looking at issues with a critical eye.
Take out the formation of the conscience all all you have left is moral relativism. That's not critically thinking, that's an accident waiting to happen!
Facts do not exist in a vacuum. There is no such thing as simply teaching facts.
In terms of education, teach the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. These documents form the yardstick with which to measure the "rightness" or the "wrongness" of the facts. A constitutional right is a right, no excuses.
Let's teach that to our students, and allow for lively debate in grades 7-12. Admit that in no uncertain terms was the internment of Japanese Americans in WW2 a constitutional act. Make no excuses for the extenuating wartime circumstances. If a heinous crime can be committed against a few thousand Americans, it can be committed against a few million when the "facts" line up in just the right proportions.