problems in the current design? How should and could these issues be rectified? What would you like the Review team to recommend in this area?

Working within the curriculum of the European Baccalaureate (created with constructive and defining input from the national inspectorates of the early EEC and later EU members), I have never found any real deficiencies in the contents of the mathematics syllabus. I doubt that there are any serious deficiencies in the British syllabus.

Every year, however, I have found it amusing that I never received a class of first year secondary pupils - all them successful in the preliminary operations of arithmetic - in which anyone could say what a number is. Surely - with all their arithmetic - they ought to know?

(See my: "So, what exactly is a number?" www.ednews.org/articles/6100/1/So-what-exactly-is-a-number/Page1.html) Despite the annoyance of a friend of mine, a French professor of number theory, it has proven eminently satisfying to my young pupils in providing them at least with an easily understood working concept!

Area 6: Parents and Families

Q1. What should the role of parents / families be in helping their children achieve in mathematics? What are the key obstacles / issues for parents and families in this regard? What more should and could we do to support parents and families in this area? What would you like the Review team to recommend in this area?

Parents, by and large, make very bad teachers. They lose their temper far too quickly; they shout too much; they expect their child to see that relations are 'obvious' - fractions, for example, or negative numbers - which were once dismissed by the most distinguished minds as absurd. They also very rarely realise that mathematics almost never deals with facts. Its applications may result in facts. It is itself mostly comprised of arguments: and arguments, in truth, which are often very highly contentious - and not just to children!

Two plus two equals four, for instance - or any similar combination - may be presented to the learning mind as if it is a fact. But the learning and inquisitive mind will not see it as a fact: for it is not. It is an argument, and an argument, furthermore, which depends on very delicate and questionable axioms. The child may see this; the parent, not. Result: explosion.

But many parents certainly do want to help. They can help by realising, as the child also needs realise, that learning is a complex process. Early experience is crucial. According to Baroness Susan Greenfield, one of the world's foremost neuroscientists: '… early experiences constitute an important factor in how well children assimilate information in more formal situations later on. .. Children's main sensory and cognitive learning achievements come from the own experiences in the course of the activities such as play, exploration, everyday talk, and social interactions with peers and siblings.'

Reporting on the success of the Head Start programme in the United States- and also on its superb cost-effectiveness - she adds: 'the experimental curriculum aimed to develop a whole range of physical and mental skills, including sharing and counting objects, fitting objects together, anticipating and remembering sequences of events, role playing, imitation, recognizing objects, playing simple musical instruments - and talking with others.' [Greenfield, 2003]

I have added the final emphasis. Children learn through talking. Here is a clear prescription for developing quantitative and qualitative skills in the early years; that is from 0 to 5 years of age.

To help children of six years and older to have more confidence in talking with others, it should not be a surprise that an advantage is for them first to be encouraged to talk aloud - carefully and thoughtfully - to themselves.

Many adults do this whenever engaged in particularly delicate tasks. It is a major assist to the brain. To encourage my own youngest pupils to try this at home - alone; with their younger siblings; with their favourite teddy; even, I told, them 'talk to your dog or your cat!' - I created a 30 page reading and colouring book called the 'Socrates Workbook 'for 9 to 11 year olds'. It was soon translated by senior pupils in my European School into five other European languages - most recently by the Qatar Foundation into Arabic.

There was a problem, however, one of the seniors told me, with the title. "It should read," he told me, "'for 9 to 19 year olds', because we all need to know what's in this book!"

Copies of this workbook in any of these languages (including Russian and Spanish) can be downloaded free from my website: www.gardenofdemocracy.org. All will be found under national flags in its 'Core Materials'.

It would of course be entirely feasible to revise the title to: 'for 7 to 19 year olds', for children can use this book, unaided, as soon as they can read. Its structure encourages them to read. In addition I have created a 'Teachers' and Parents Guide to the Socrates Method' with details from the National Literacy Trust statistics in support. This, too, can be downloaded free from the same 'Core Materials'.

Area 7: Primary Frameworks and EYFS

Q1. What assessment do you make of the Primary Frameworks / EYFS and its effectiveness? How can the Review team build upon the Primary Frameworks?

An education system which depends for its future on more and more 'interventions' by more and more professionals, with more and more assistants, at a greater and greater cost - all this without any apparent permanent improvement in the underlying health of the system: in its ability, that is, to revert to governing itself without continued support and with better results, with far less personnel, and at far less cost - cannot be sustained economically or justified pedagogically. It is, to use a very useful expression, essentially undoable.

A strategy as badly conceived as this cannot therefore be 'built on'. It will only waste more resources; burn out more careers; destroy more lives. There has to be a complete revision of the aims of education: together with the abandonment, especially in mathematics teaching, of the traditional primary-secondary divide. This, as I have attempted to explain, no longer makes any sense.

But first of all, this crisis requires a champion of heroic moral courage. Someone must have the honesty, the courage and integrity, to say to the - literally - millions of children whose lives it has permanently harmed, to the hundreds of thousands of teachers who have abandoned their careers in despair: "Sorry! Our mission cannot be accomplished in this way. I did not begin it, but I am now responsible for sorting out this mess. We must tell our kids and their teachers that they are going to get a better deal."

The present situation simply cannot be improved by pouring in more money - aka more 'personalised learning' - into a bottomless pit. Taken to its logical conclusion, this will eventually lead to every pupil being allocated an individual teacher. In addition to a necessary disavowal of this strategy - one which is likely to be a major political burden in coming elections - you have to deal with an even more distressing factor described to me a short while ago by a teacher of 30 years' experience in a major inner-London comprehensive.

"When I began," he told me dispassionately: he will retire in a few years' time, "in my school we only spoke English. Now there are over 50 languages. But that isn't our problem. Our problem is that the whole British education system is now corrupt from top to bottom; from inspectors, through head-teachers, right down to the classroom, no-one tells the truth any more. If they did, they would have to quit."

This is like a war on the losing side - before the final collapse.

Area 8: General thoughts / comments

Q1. Do you have other thoughts / comments that you would like to make? If so, please let us know here.

I think I have probably commented quite enough! But may I end with an invitation to you and your Royal Society colleagues? As you will have noted, I shall be hosting a conference in December 2008 at St George's House, Windsor Castle. Its title is: Adopting the Socrates Method for teaching mathematics: encouraging a culture of democratic behaviour to foster inter-cultural and inter-faith understanding and tolerance.

The conference will be supported on the first day by the Qatar Foundation, whose President, H.H. Sheikha Mozah, consort of the Emir of Qatar, is UNESCO Special Envoy for Basic and Higher Education and winner of the 2007 Chatham House prize. It will be open to delegates of the Qatar Foundation and other invited international specialists in education. The acting chairman of the EU Cultural and Education Committee has recently expressed a wish to be kept informed on behalf of his own Committee and its group co-ordinators.

My colleagues and I will explain how, starting the early years, mathematics teaching can sustain and not stifle cultural diversity; how it can steadily and naturally reduce potentials for conflict; how it can support a steady and controlled progression towards democracy; how it can be made exciting and enjoyable to belong to a class which learns in this way - and, finally, how it can and should be a most rewarding life-long career!

The second day will be for collaborative discussions; to describe the development of this new approach via the original two-year study in Germany for the EU Education Commission, through supportive university research in Hungary, government sponsored development in Germany and its application in student teacher courses in the United States.

Applications to attend will be most cordially received - preferably before July 2008. Offers of further financial support will also be gratefully received - and will be properly accounted for.

Colin Hannaford, Oxford, November 2007.

Wednesday

November 14th, 2007

Colin Hannaford

British and Foreign correspondent EducationNews.org

Subscribe

Enter your email to subscribe to daily Education News!

Hot Topics

Career Index

Plan your career as an educator using our free online datacase of useful information.

View All